ROHUL AMIN AKAND v. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-22. ROHUL AMIN AKAND v. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/8 GAHC010052462019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1726/2019 ROHUL AMIN AKAND S/O- LT AHMAD ALI AKAND, VILL- SATIPUR, P. O. AND P. S. DHALIGAON, DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD), ASSAM VERSUS THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS. HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT IOCL-BGR, DHALIGAON, CHIRANG (BTAD), ASSAM, PIN- 783385 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER IN-CHARGE (CGM I/C) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783385 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (T) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783385 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 5:THE DY. GENERAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON Page No. # 2/8 CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, I O C Linked Case : WP(C)/1735/2019 ROHUL AMIN AKAND S/O- LATE AHMAD ALI AKAND VILLAGE- SATIPUR P. O. AND P. S. DHALIGAON DIST. - CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. VERSUS THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.
AND 4 ORS. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. PIN- 783385. 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER IN-CHARGE (CGM I/C) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. PIN- 783385. 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (T) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. PIN- 783385. 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. PIN- 783385. 5:THE DEPUTY GENREAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON Page No. # 3/8 DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. PIN- 783385. ------------ Advocate for : MD. R ALI Advocate for : SC I O C appearing for THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS. Linked Case : WP(C)/1729/2019 ROHUL AMIN AKAND S/O- LT AHMAD ALI AKAND VILL- SATIPUR P. O. AND P. S. DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM VERSUS THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS. HAVING ITS REGD.
OFFICE AT IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783385 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER IN-CHARGE (CGM I/C) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783385 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (T) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 783385 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM Page No. # 4/8 5:THE DY. GENERAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. A M KHAN Advocate for : SC I O C appearing for THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS. Linked Case : WP(C)/2015/2019 ROHUL AMIN AKAND S/O. LT. AHMAD ALI AKAND VILL. SATIPUR P. O. AND P. S. DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. VERSUS THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD AND 4 ORS. HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM-783385. 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER IN CHARGE (CGM I/C) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM-783385. 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (T) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM-783385.
4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. 5:THE DY. GENERAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. ------------ Page No. # 5/8 Advocate for : MR. R ALI Advocate for : SC I O C appearing for THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD AND 4 ORS. Linked Case : WP(C)/1841/2019 ROHUL AMIN AKAND S/O. LT. AHMAD ALI AKAND VILL. SATIPUR P. O. AND P. S. DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. VERSUS THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS. HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM PIN-783385. 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER IN-CHARGE (CGM I/C) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM-783385. 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (T) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM-783385. 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM-783385. 5:THE DY. GENERAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM-783385. ------------ Page No. # 6/8 Advocate for : MR.
R ALI Advocate for : SC I O C appearing for THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS. Linked Case : WP(C)/1890/2019 ROHUL AMIN AKAND S/O- LATE AHMAD ALI AKAND VILL- SATIPUR P. O AND P. S- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM VERSUS THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS HAVING ITS REGD OFFICE AT IOCL- BGR DHALIGAON CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783385 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER IN CHARGE (CGM I/C) IOCL BGR DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783385 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (T) IOCL BGR DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM PIN- 783385 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) IOCL- BGR DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 5:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (MAINTENANCE) IOCL-BGR DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG Page No. # 7/8 BTAD ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. R ALI Advocate for : SC I O C appearing for THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 22-12-2020 Heard Mr. A. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. R.
Kakoti, learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) authorities. The petitioners are contractors and they were awarded with different works by the respondent IOC. According to them, all the petitioners had completed the works awarded to them and upon examination of the works executed by them, the respondent authorities were satisfied with the same. The petitioners, in due course, had also submitted bills for the works executed by them before the respondent authorities but their dues have not been disbursed till date. Ms. R. Kakoti has submitted, on instruction, that further 4 (four) week’s time would be required for the respondent authorities to examine the claims of the petitioners in respect of the bills submitted by them for the works stated to be executed by them and to disburse the amounts found entitled upon such examination.
Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that instead of keeping these writ petitions pending the same can be disposed of with a direction to the respondent IOC to examine the claims of the petitioners in respect of the bills submitted by them for the works executed by them and after such examination, to disburse the amount entitled for the said works. In view of the submission made above by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds it appropriate to dispose of these writ petitions with the direction to the respondent authorities in the IOC to examine the claims of the petitioners with regard to the bills submitted by them for the works they stated to have completed and upon such Page No. # 8/8 consideration, to disburse the amounts to the petitioners entitled for such works. A further direction is made to complete the entire exercise as expeditiously as possible preferably within 31. 01. 2021. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.