Kethavath Balsingh, v. The State of Telangana,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SUJANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-05. Kethavath Balsingh, v. The State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
1. [ 33851 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT K. S,UJANA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE '15303 CRIMINAL PETITIONN O: OF 2025 Between: Aged about 26 Years' Occ Business' Kethavath Balsingh S/o. Balya, rili. ri-rti" n-51 l,"lndrisenareridy Nlgar Colony, Karmanghat' saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-500035' Petitioner/Accused No. 1 AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosectutor'+l igh Court of (brNo11s9bf 2025,poticestationsaroornagar, iiji""'i""lir,niiivo"eiaoao Rangi Reddy Di'strict. ) ... ResPondenUCom Plainant of BNSS praying that in the circumstances Petition under Section 482 stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may n" pf". t"J to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of the petitioner's anest in f. t n Uo. ttSg OF 2025 on the file of Police Station Saroornagar' pending inve-stigation, trial into the said crime.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsof Sri R Giri Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri D Arun Kumar' Additional of the Respondent Public Prosecutor on behalf The Court made the following: ORDER i I I I I ! -##F-nqri/ . :. F7 ,/ . NGANA IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI. I AT HYDERABAD JUSTICE K. STT''"NA THE HONOURABLE SMT. i N o . 15303 0F 201" CRIMINAL PETITION 2025 osth DAY OF DECEMBER Betweetl : Ke thavath Balsingh Petitroner/A. I And The State of Telangana, Rep. , by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad, Station, Saroornagar (Cr. No. 1159 of 2025, Police Ranga ReddY District) ResPonden t ORDER is filed under Scc -ion 482 of This criminal Petition bY the Suraksha Sanhita, 2C,3 Bharatiya Nagarik with FIR bail in conne(r ion petitioner/A. 1 seeking anticipatory Police Station' lachakonda' No.
1159 of 2O25 of Saroor Nagar the petitioner is undr: Section 144 The offence alleged against 2023 and under iections 3' 4 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and 5 of PIT Act 2. The case o[ the prosecution is that on reliable information the defacto complainant conducted raid on Grand Cu? Unisex Beauly Saloon, Beside Venkatcshrtara Hospitals, Karmanghat, Saroornagar, wherein the police apprehended Organizers, customers and three victim \r,omen. On enquiry, they revealed the ir names and lhe main organizer who is A. 1 was nol available at the time of raid and he is absconding. After completion of confession and seizure panchanama, A. 2 to A. S and victim women were brought to P. S. , along with the seized material and lodged a reporl. Basing on Lhe said complaint, police registered the case against the accused for the said offences. 3. Heard Sri R. Giri Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State 4.
The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent of thc said allegations and he is falsely implicated in this case. Though his name is mentioned as main organizer petitioner is not present at the time of raid and he was shown as absconding. The investigating ofhcer without any preliminary enquiry, arrayed the petitioner as accused and llrat material part of investigation is already compl ted. Hence, praycd this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the' : :r itioner 5. On thc othcr hand, learned Additional PuL:i -- Prosecutor opposcd bail on the ground that the petitiont r is tlte main organizer in this case and he is abscondilg frrrrr the datc of ol'li:t-rcc. As thc offcnce is a heinous one custodi. r n[errogal ion ol the pctitioncr is required in this case. As sul t, requested to dismiss this petition. 'hrs Cullrt €r.
Consiclcring the submissions made anrL pe rusal of m:rterial on rec:ord, according to the investigat r g aurhority, pctitioner is an organizer of the saloon and lr is illegally rtrnning massage centre under the guise of Saloo:t without any valicl permissions. Considering the severity of alir this 3ations, colrrt dcclines to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Acr:ordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed Miscellancous pctitions, if any, pending shall stanrl :toq11Q, . sD/- AH(IE I ABDULLA KHAN 'ANT REGISTRAR /-AQs{l; -/ I t' \\ //TRUE COPY// \ ECTION OFFICER t \ v To, -V Additional 1 The Special Judrcial Magistrate of First Class (Excise)-cur jrni, ciuir Judge-cum-i Additional Metropolitan Magistrr e, LB Nagar, Ranga ReddY Sta-tion' Fz :hakonda z ine"Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police High Court for the State cf Ielangana at a. fwo CCs to Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad IOUT] a One CC to Sri R Giri Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 5.
Two CD CoPies AB K/PSI-kr =;5 HIGH COURT DATED: 0511212025 r{E STf ) ,^, s ORDER . ) , L, L, 2026 71 JIN ) GRLP. No. 15303 of 2025 I '. ';2 ss:}j DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION cy C96A V \d- {to\'s
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.