SMT TAKHELLAMBAM (O) BHEIGYABATI DEVI v. NIDHI KESARWANI
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2020-06-09. SMT TAKHELLAMBAM (O) BHEIGYABATI DEVI v. NIDHI KESARWANI. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 4 (Through Video Conferencing) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CONT. CAS(C) No. 200 of 2018 Smt. Takhellambam (O) Bheigyabati Devi …. Petitioner - Versus - Nidhi Kesharwani & 4 Ors. …Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR 09. 06. 2020 None appears for the petitioner. Mr. P. Tamphamani, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1, Mr. A. Rommel, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. S. Suresh, learned ASG appears for the respondent No. 5. Contempt petition has been filed alleging that order of the learned Single Judge dated 27. 07. 2018 has been violated. Today, when the matter is taken up, Mr. S. Suresh, learned ASG appearing for the respondent No. 5 states that order of the learned Single Judge has been modified by order dated 05. 02. 2020 passed in W. A. No. 54 of 2019. Operative portion of the order dated 05. 02. 2020 reads as follows : “[5] In this view of the matter, we are inclined to modify the paragraph No.
5 of the order dated 27. 07. 2018 of the learned Single Judge passed in W. P. (C) No. 82 of 2018 to the effect that the respondents authorities will consider the representation of the respondent/writ petitioner for family pension based on her Page 1 claim and eligibility as per the service records, which should be supported by the relevant service rules. [6] On such claim made by the respondent/writ petition through Mr. Ch. Robinchandra, learned counsel, the authority will decide the matter as expeditiously as possible preferably within 8 to 12 weeks from the date of the receipt of the representation. Mr. Ch. Robinchandra, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petition seeks four weeks’ time to prepare the representation along with the relevant documents and submit the same to the respondent No. 1 and 2. The order of the learned Single Judge is approved except for the modification as above. ” In view of the modification of the order dated 27. 07.
2018 of the learned Single Judge passed in W. P. (C) No. 82 of 2018 by the order dated 05. 02. 2020 passed in W. A. No. 59 of 2019, cause for filing the contempt petition does not survive. Accordingly, contempt petition stands closed. CHIEF JUSTICE bipin Digitally WAIKH signed by WAIKHOM OM TONEN MEITEI Date: TONEN 2020. 06. 10 12:54:43 MEITEI +05'30' Page 2
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.