Apurva Vairagi @ Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Singh v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-11-28. Apurva Vairagi @ Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Singh v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 11169 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -352 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Apurva Vairagi @ Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Singh S/O Adhir Vairagi R/O Village- Maa Ambey Clinic Near By Adarsh Hospital, P. S- Shivpuri, Distt. - Shivpuri, State- Madhya Pradesh. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada P. S. Case No.
352/2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67(a)/84(c) of the I. T. Act, 2022 later on chargesheet has been submitted under Sections 376, 509 of Indian Penal Code and Section 67(a) of Information and Technology Act, 2000 and Section 14 Foreigners Act, 1946. 3. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 16. 04. 2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8406/2024. 4. As per the prosecution case, petitioner who is a Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 11169 of 2025(5) dt. 28-11-2025 2/2 Bangladeshi and already married from before had trapped the victim and subsequently has committed rape with her. The petitioner has also threatened the victim girl that he will make the photographs of intimate moments viral. The petitioner used to threaten the father of the victim also. 5. The petitioner is in jail since 20. 07. 2023. 6.
Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that the victim has supported the prosecution case. 7. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.