Sangiseti Srinivasulu v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-11. Sangiseti Srinivasulu v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16517 OF 2025 Between: Sanqiseti Srinivasulu, S/o. Janaiah, aged about 59 years, Occ. Business, M/s. Garidardri Enterprises Business, R/o. H. No. 9-135, Seetharampouram, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda. ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. The State of Telangana, Represented through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, HYderabad. 2. Md AktharPasha, S/o. Md. Yakoob Ali, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Proprietor, Madeena Enter Prixes, M. G. Road, Kothagudem R/o. H. No. 5-9-62, Coolie Line, Kothagudem. ... RESPO N DENT/COM P LAI NAN TS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the impugned proceedings in C. C. No.
1311 of 2020 on the file of Honble lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem, against the Petitioner/ Accused, in the interest of justice and pass @ Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim orders suspending the docket order dated 31-07- 2025, issuing the NBW in C. C. No. 1311 of 2020 on the file of Honble lll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem, against the Petitioner/ Accused. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri DONTINENI SREeNtVRSn RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. Jithender Rao Veeramalla the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared forthe Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 165 7 of 2or25 DATE: 11. 12. 2O25 en: Sangiseti Srinivasulu . .. . Petitioner/ accused AND The State of Telangana, Represented through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana Hyderabad and another .... Respondents lr-) This criminal petition has been frled by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 1311 of 2O2O on the frle of the III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem, for the offences under Sections 42O, 468 and 506 read with 34 of the IPC. 2. Heard Mrs. V. Preethi Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. D. Srinivas Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Jithender Rao Veerama. lla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. I State. t I \ I 3.
Upon perusal of the record, it reveals that the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem, issued Non Bailable Warrants (NBWs) against the petitioner on 3L. O7. 2025 arrd the I I said NBWs are pending against the petitioner. Even according to the t I learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has not filed any \ \ application seeking recall of the NBWs. Hence, she requested that the petitioner may be granted. liberty to file an application seeking recall of the NBWs pending against him and upon filing such application, the learned Magistrate be directed to consider the salne. She further to approach this that the petitioner may be granted liberty . requested court to file a fresh quash petition after recalling the NBWS. 4.
tn view of the above said submissions, this Court without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the petitioner is granted liberty to file necessary application seeking recall of the NBWs by invoking the provisions of Section 72 of. the BNSS l7O(21of the Cr'P'C" learned Upon filing such application, t]1e Magistrate is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law' The petitioner is also granted liberty to file a fresh quash petition thereafter 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the criminal petition is dipposed of Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed S C. DEEPIKA ASStsrANrEtsrRAR t //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ To, of First class' Kothagudem' Bhadradri 1 The lll Additional Judicial Magistrate n Kothagudem District I 2. oneCCtoSRl. DoNTlNENlSREEN|VASARAoAdvocate[oPUC] of Telangana court for the state 3. Two ccs to PUBLIG PROSECUTOR, High at Hyderabad [OUT]' 4. Two CD CoPies i w . - -.. -. - -=,' . - "-a i i :':"'r- ..
*u*'l'"'""'tt:"" ; ! l \ ' Fi\ HIGH COURT JSRJ DATED i1111212025 TI-IE S € o (_) 160t[m6 <,- * * CRLP. No. 16517 of 2025 CRIMINAL PEITITION IS DISPOSED OF.
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.