SMT. SHAKEERA BANU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-29. SMT. SHAKEERA BANU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 13848 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 29 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 13848 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SMT. SHAKEERA BANU W/O PARVEEZ AHMED AGED 47 YEARS TH R/AT NO. 78/2, 11 CROSS SHANTHINAGAR, UDAYAGIRI MYSORE-570019 THE PETITIONER IS THE WIFE OF THE CONVICT PRISONER NO. 17865 PARVEZ WHO IS SERVING LIFE SENTENCE IN MYSORE CENTRAL PRISON …PETITIONER Digitally signed (BY SRI. PRADEEP PATIL, ADVOCATE) by NAGARAJA B M AND: Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001 2. THE LIFE CONVICTS RELEASE COMMITTEE HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA - 2 - WP No. 13848 of 2026 BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE PRISONS & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES NO. 9, SHESHADRI ROAD GANDHI NAGAR BENGALURU-560009 4.
THE CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON MYSORE-570007 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. P. YOGANNA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE R1 AND 2 TO TAKE A DECISION ON THE RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE ADVISORY BOARD DATED 02. 04. 2026 IS PRODUCED AS ANNX-C INSOFAR PRISONER DATED 02. 04. 2026 IS PRODUCED AS ANNX-C IN SO FAR PRISONER NO. 17865 PARVEZ S/O ABDUL JABBAR EXPEDIOUSLY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed by the wife of the victim seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus against - 3 - WP No. 13848 of 2026 respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to consider and grant premature release of the detenue, who stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. 2.
It is not in dispute that the detenue has undergone incarceration for a period of 14 years, 11 months and 9 days. The detenue has sought premature release, and the Advisory Board, upon reconsideration, has recommended his case for such release. The matter is presently under consideration before respondent No. 2 – the Committee. 3. The petitioner places reliance on the order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Sri Ashwatha Narayana Reddy vs. State of Karnataka and others in W. P. No. 8787/2026, to contend that in similar circumstances, where the Advisory Board has recommended premature release, this Court has directed - 4 - WP No. 13848 of 2026 release of the convict on parole pending consideration by the Life Convicts Release Committee (LCRC). 4.
Having regard to the consistent view taken by this Court in similar matters, and taking note of the fact that the Advisory Board has already recommended the case of the detenue for premature release, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner is entitled to limited relief. 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court proceeds to pass the following; ORDER (i) The writ petition is allowed in part. (ii) Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are directed to release Convict Prisoner No. 17865, namely Parvez, on general parole forthwith, subject to terms and conditions as set by the authority, pending consideration and final decision by the Life Convicts Release Committee (LCRC) and the State Government regarding his premature release. - 5 - WP No. 13848 of 2026 (iii) It is made clear that the aforesaid release is purely interim in nature and shall be subject to the final outcome of the decision to be taken by the LCRC. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No. : 1 Sl No. : 28
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.