Skip to main content
LawSphereX

IRFAN NASIBKHAN PATHAN v. STATE OF GUJARAT

Court: High Court of Gujarat

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Gujarat judgment dated 2020-12-21. IRFAN NASIBKHAN PATHAN v. STATE OF GUJARAT. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 19439 of 2020 ========================================================== IRFAN NASIBKHAN PATHAN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR. KALRAV R PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Applicants MR JAIVIK BHATT, ADVOCATE for the COMPLAINANT MS NISHA THAKORE, APP for the Respondent STATE ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY Date : 21/12/2020 ORAL ORDER 1. This application is filed by the original accused for quashing and setting aside the FIR being C. R. -I No. 89 of 2018 registered with Ranip Police Station, District : Ahmedabad City for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act. 2. Amendment is granted. 3. Rule. Ms. Thakore, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr.

Jaivik Bhatt, learned advocate waive service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respective parties. 4. Learned advocates for the applicants and learned advocate for the complainant have jointly submitted that the parties have settled the dispute out of the Court. It is jointly submitted that the impugned complaint be quashed. 5. It is noted that, in the complaint, no offence to public at large is made out. It is a private dispute which the parties have settled. 6. Considering the totality, the following order is passed. 6. 1 This application is allowed. 6. 2 The FIR being C. R. -I No. 89 of 2018 registered with Ranip Police Station, District : Ahmedabad City and all other consequential proceedings arising out of said FIR are hereby quashed and set aside. 6. 3 Rule is made absolute in above terms. (PARESH UPADHYAY, J) SALIM/MHDave/Bhati/ 04

Source: High Court of Gujarat. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.