Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SUBHAN KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-01-13. SUBHAN KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[2025:RJ-JD:2132] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 243/2025 1. Subhan Khan S/o Shri Imam Khan, Aged About 84 Years, R/o Teliwara, Bhaniyana, Pokaran, Jaisalmer. 2. Ayub Khan S/o Shri Subhan Khan, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Teli Ka Bas, Teliwara, Bandhewa, Pokaran, Jaisalmer. 3. Mukhtayar S/o Shri Subhan Khan, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Teliwada, Jaisalmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Jaisalmer. 2. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Bhaniyana, District Jaisalmer. 3. Tehsildar, Bhaniyana, District Jaisalmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Purohit HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/01/2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners instead of joining the issues on merit submits that he will be satisfied if a liberty is granted to the petitioners to file reply to the notice dated 04. 12.

2024 received under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act. He, therefore, prays that the respondent No. 3- Tehsildar, Bhaniyana, District Jaisalmer may be directed to decide the pending proceedings in furtherance of the notice dated 04. 12. 2024 after considering the reply filed by the petitioners by passing a speaking order. [2025:RJ-JD:2132] (2 of 2) [CW-243/2025] 3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file reply to the notice dated 04. 12. 2024 issued by the respondent No. 3-Tehsildar, Bhaniyana, District Jaisalmer and the respondent No. -3-Tehsildar Bhaniyana, District Jaisalmer is directed to decide the pending proceedings after considering the reply filed by the petitioner by passing an appropriate and speaking order within a period of 6 weeks from today, strictly in accordance with law. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 85-/Arun P/-

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.