SHARADAMMA v. SMT. S. SUMITHRA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2020-12-21. SHARADAMMA v. SMT. S. SUMITHRA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY C. C. C. NO. 677 OF 2020 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. SHARADAMMA W/O LATE K. R SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS 2. VENKATARAM S/O LATE K. R SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 3. NAGARAJ S/O LATE K. R SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 1 TO 3 R/AT KACHRAKANAHALLI KASABA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU – 560084. COMPLAINANT NOS. 1 TO 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER I. E TH 4 COMPLAINANT 4. RAFIQ AHMED S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO 7, MUNISWAMAPPA LAYOUT LINGARAJAPURAM BENGALURU 560084. … COMPLAINANTS (BY SHRI S SARVANA, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI D. R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT S SUMITHRA W/O SRI SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RD RD NO 27, 3 ‘A’ CROSS, 3 BLOCK HRBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR BENGALURU - 560084. 2.
SRI SUBRAMANI S/O LATE MUNISAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RD RD NO 27, 3 A CROSS, 3 BLOCK HRBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR BENGALURU - 560084 … ACCUSED --- THIS C. C. C. IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF CONTEMPT COMMITTED BY THE RESPONDENTS WITH REFERENCE TO THE ORDERS PASSED IN O. S. NO. 8026/2016, DATED 24. 11. 2016 ANNEXURE-D, AND TO PROSECUTE AND PUNISH THEM AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS MAY BE DEEMED APPROPRIATE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC. THIS C. C. C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The order of which breach is alleged has been passed by the Civil Court in purported exercise of power under Rule 1 of Order XXXIX of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, “the CPC”). The complainants can always take recourse to the remedy available under Rule 2A of Order XXXIX of CPC. 2.
By keeping open the said remedy, this contempt petition is disposed of. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE vgh*
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.