SMT. SHARDA AGRAWAL v. UNION OF INDIA
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-11-03. SMT. SHARDA AGRAWAL v. UNION OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2540 of 2020 1. Smt. Sharda Agrawal W/o Shri Om Prakash Agrawal Aged About 60 Years R/o B - 14, Chhugani Pride, Changora Bhata, Raipur, P. S D. D. U. Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Kalpana Gupta W/o Shri Vijendra Gupta Aged About 38 Years R/o H. No. 46/884, Ravi Shankar Shukla Chowk, Naya Para, Raipur, P. S. Gole Bazar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. Shyam Lal Shakar S/o Late Shri Dukalu Ram Aged About 76 Years R/o H. No. 48/344, Purani Basti, Lohar Chowk, Dr. Soni Wali Gali, Raipur, P. S. Azad Chowk, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4. Smt. Rekha Sonkar D/o Shri Shyam Lal Shakar (Sonkar) Aged About 49 Years R/o Purani Basti, Lohar Chowk, Raipur, P. S. Azad Chowk, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5. Smt. Sarla Sonkar D/o Shri Shyam Lal Shakar (Sonkar) Aged About 51 Years R/o Purani Basti, Lohar Chowk, Raipur, P. S. Azad Chowk, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6.
Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Shyam Lal Shakar Aged About 52 Years R/o Purani Basti, Lohar Chowk, Raipur, P. S. Azad Chowk, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7. Satish Kumar Shakar S/o Shri Shyam Lal Shakar Aged About 53 Years R/o Purani Basti, Lohar Chowk, Dr. Soni Wali Gali, H. No. 48/344, Raipur, P. S. Azad Chowk, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 8. Smt. Vandana Sharma W/o Shri Neeraj Sharma Aged About 45 Years R/o A-4, Chhugani Pride, Chhangora Bhata, Raipur, P. S. D. D. U. Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 9. Smt. Madhvi Chaurasiya W/o Shri J. R. Chaurasiya Aged About 50 Years R/o B - 14, Chhugani Pride, Changora Bhata, Raipur, P. S. D. D. U. Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 10. Nitish Chakravarti S/o Shri Satish Chandra Chakravarti Aged About 66 Years R/o C - 3, Chhugani Pride, Changora Bhata, Raipur, P. S. D. D. U. Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners Versus 1.
Union Of India Through Central Registrar, Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare Department Of Agriculture Co - Operation And Farmers Welfare Officer Of The Central Registrar Of Co -Operative Societies Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. Commissioner Office Of The Central Registrar Of Co - Operative Societies, Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare Department Agriculture, Cooperative And Farmers Welfare Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Registrar Adarsh Credit Co - Operative Society Ltd. Registration No. MSCS /CR/269/2008 Central Office Udaipur (Rajasthan). 4. H. S. Patel Liquidator, Adarsh Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd. 14, Vidya Vihar Colony, Usmanpura, Ahmedabad 380013, Gujrat. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Asst. S. G. Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 03/11/2020 1.
The limited grievance that the petitioner has raised in this case is that the petitioners had made certain deposits in the respondent No. 3 Adarsh Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. under various schemes and heads, however, subsequently the respondent No. 3 establishment has been closed and at the instance of respondent No. 1 a Liquidator was also appointed i. e. respondent No. 4. 2. The counsel for the petitioners submits that meanwhile the deposits of other creditors were released, however, the deposits made by the petitioners were not released. The petitioners make a limited prayer that let the respondents No. 1 & 4 take a decision on the claim application of the petitioners seeking for release of the amount lying deposited with the respondent No. 3. 3. The limited request made by the petitioners is not opposed by the learned Assistant Solicitor General. 4. Accordingly, the respondents No.
1 & 4 are directed to take a decision on the application which the petitioners have filed seeking for release of the amount which is lying with the respondent No. 3 which was deposited by the petitioners under different schemes and heads. It is expected that the authorities would take a decision at the earliest preferably within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of copy of this order purely in accordance with rules and guidelines governing the field. 5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.