SACHIN v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. SACHIN v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PREM NARAYAN SINGH nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 2480 of 2024 BETWEEN:- SACHIN S/O SHRI BHANVARRAO BHODVEN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION: JOB R/O. B-3-2211, NANO CITY, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPLICANT (MS. SONALI RAJORIA - ADVOCATE) AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSE OFFICER THROUGH POLICE STATION LASUDIA, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (SHRI SURENDRA GUPTA - GOVT. ADVOCATE) This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER Heard and perused the case diary. This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail in relation to FIR/Crime No. 1071/2023, registered at Police Station-Lasudiya, District Indore, for the offence under Sections 8/21, of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985. Applicant is in jail since 25. 07.
2023. 2. As per prosecution story, 12 grams of Brown Sugar has been Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUMATHI Signing time: 03-02- 2024 16:17:29 recovered from the possession of applicant. 3 . It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Non commercial quantity of 12 grams of Brown Sugar has been recovered from the present applicant. There are no criminal antecedents against the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 25. 07. 2023 (more than 6 months in custody) and final conclusion of trial will take considerable long time. Hence, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application and prays f o r its rejection, however, it is fairly submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicant. 5.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that it is a case in which applicant may be released on bail. Consequently, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this first bail application u/s. 439 of Cr. P. C. filed on behalf of the applicant is allowed. 6. It is directed that the applicant/accused be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. It is also directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr. P. C. 7. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become ineffective. Certified copy as per rules.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUMATHI Signing time: 03-02- 2024 16:17:29 (PREM NARAYAN SINGH) JUDGE sumathi Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUMATHI Signing time: 03-02- 2024 16:17:29
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.