MALLAPPA S/O RUDRAPAP RAMAPURA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-09-18. MALLAPPA S/O RUDRAPAP RAMAPURA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 107898 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH TH DATED THIS THE 18 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107898 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: MALLAPPA S/O RUDRAPPA RAMAPURA, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: KADASHETTY HALLI, TQ: HANAGAL, DIST: HAVERI-581 104. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIDYASHANKAR. G. DALWAI. , ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAVERI, OFFICE AT HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, Location: HIGH COURT OF SAVANUR, TQ: SAVANUR, KARNATAKA DIST: HAVERI. 4. TAHASILDAR, HANAGAL, TQ: HANAGAL, DIST: HAVERI. 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR BOMMANAHALLI, TQ: HANAGAL, DIST: HAVERI. 6. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, KADASHETTY HALLI, TQ: HANAGAL, DIST: HAVERI. …RESPONDENTS - 2 - WP No.
107898 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 04. 09. 2024, on that day, finally two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 18. 09. 2024. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied. The petitioner has not respected the Court order. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is - 3 - WP No. 107898 of 2023 dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No. : 1 Sl No. : 21
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.