Prem Prakash Patel v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-03. Prem Prakash Patel v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83502 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -596 Year-2025 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Prem Prakash Patel S/o- Late Harihar Prasad, resident of village - Nahun PS- Rajgir Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Krishnanagar P. S. Case No.
596 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 318(2), 319(2), 336(3), 338 and 340, 61(2)(a), 3(5), 111(3), 114(4), 111(5), 111(6) and 117(7) of the B. N. S. 3. The police intercepted a person riding a motorcycle, who disclosed his name as Subodh Kumar Yadav. Upon search, two admit cards of Bihar Police Constable recruitment examination were found. Thereafter, police enquired about the aforesaid admit cards and when no satisfactory explanation was given by the said person, he was arrested and his flat was also searched. Upon the search of the flat, the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 83502 of 2025(2) dt. 03-12-2025 2/2 petitioner was found to be present in the said flat and there are several admit cards, electronic instruments related to the Bihar Police Constable Service recruitment examination were recovered from the said flat. 4. The petitioner is in custody since 19. 07. 2025. 5.
During the investigation, it has come that the petitioner and other accused persons were involved in managing the examination on behalf of gullible candidates after accepting money. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.