PROBIN CH. SAIKIA @ PROBIN SAIKIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-04. PROBIN CH. SAIKIA @ PROBIN SAIKIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010099172020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3043/2020 PROBIN CH. SAIKIA @ PROBIN SAIKIA S/O LATE PUNIRAM SAIKIA, R/O SUNDERPUR, EAST MILAN NAGAR, P. O. - C. R. BUILDING, P. S. AND DIST-DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ASSAM DIPSUR GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH DIST-DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786001 5:THE DIBRUGARH MUNICIPAL BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH DIST-DIBRUGARH ASSAM Page No. # 2/3 PIN-786001 6:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER DIBRUGARH MUNICIPAL BOARD DIST-DIRUGARH ASSAM PIN-78600 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR.
JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR ORDER 04. 12. 2020 Heard Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Doley, learned State counsel for the respondents. The petitioner’s grievance, in short, is that he retired from service as Tax Daroga of Municipal Board, Dibrugarh on 31. 09. 2019 on attaining the age of superannuation at 60 years. After retirement, the petitioner has not been paid the retirement benefits even after submission of representations, dated 29. 10. 2019, 27. 11. 2019 and 18. 02. 2020 respectively and none of the aforesaid representations has been disposed off till today. Mr. Doley, learned State counsel appearing for the respondents, submits that as the consecutive representations filed by the petitioner have been pending with the Municipal Authority at Dibrugarh, the respondents more particularly the respondent Nos.
5 and 6 may be directed to consider the representations and dispose off the aforesaid representations by speaking order within a specific time period. Mr. R. S. Mishra agrees to the suggestion made by Mr. B. Doley. Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and consideration of the grievance averred in the petition along with the documents annexed therewith, this Court finds it expedient in the interest of justice to direct the respondents more particularly the respondent Page No. # 3/3 Nos. 5 and 6 to consider and dispose off the representations referred to above filed by the petitioner by speaking order within a period of 4(four) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order to be delivered by the petitioner. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.