M/S MARIYAM INFRA STRUCTURE PVT LTD v. MR. SHAIK JAMALUDDEN
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-12. M/S MARIYAM INFRA STRUCTURE PVT LTD v. MR. SHAIK JAMALUDDEN. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
- 1 - CMP No. 270 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 270 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. M/S MARIYAM INFRA STRUCTURE PVT LTD NO. 14, SAYEEDA COMPLEX R T NAGAR MAIN ROAD RAHMATH NAGAR OPP INDIAN OIL PETROL BUNK BANGALORE-560032 REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. SAYEED-UR-RAHMAN S/O LATE MOHAMMED MOTI-UR RAHMAN. 2. SAYEED UR RAHMAN S/O LATE MOHAMMED MOTI UR RAHMAN …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P M NARAYANASWAMY. , ADVOCATE) AND: MR. SHAIK JAMALUDDEN S/O MR. LATE SHAIK MOHIDEEN Digitally signed R/AT NO. 548 15TH MAIN by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA 3RD CROSS HMT LAYOUT Location: HIGH MATHIKERE BANGALORE-560054. COURT OF …RESPONDENT KARNATAKA THIS CIVIL MISC.
PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT INDEPENDENT PERSON / PERSONS AS ARBITRATOR OR RETIRED JUDICIAL OFFICER AS A SOLE ARBITRATOR TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT RELATED TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING DATED 08/06/2017 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 2 - CMP No. 270 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: Wherefore it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to appoint independent person / persons as arbitrator or retired Judicial Officer as a sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the petitioner and respondent related to Memorandum of Understanding dated 08/06/2017 in the interest of justice. 2. None appears for the petitioner. 3. Despite the order dated 28. 11.
2025, neither the process fee has been paid nor is there any appearance on the part of the petitioner. 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No. : 1 Sl No. : 95
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.