Mohammad Abrar Ahmed v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA,GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-02-24. Mohammad Abrar Ahmed v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 34el I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTTCE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 5372 OF 2026 Between: tVlohammad Abrar Ahmed, S/o tMohammad Anees Ahmed Aged about. 42 Yrs, Occ. Business R/o H. No. 6-16/1, Near Karremma Temple, Bijinapally Village and Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, Telangana State ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2. The Director General of Police, State of Telangana Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nagarkurnool,Nagarkurnool District 4. -The Station House Officer, Bijinapatly ft/landal, N'agarkurnool District,Telangana State 5. Syed Taj Shareef, S/o Yousuf Shareef Aged about. 45 Yrs, Occ.
Agriculture R/o Thainikal Village, Kalwakurthy Mandal, Nagarkurnool District 6. Yousuf Shareef, S/o Syed Bala Sharif Kalaa Aged about. 65 Yrs, Occ. Business R/o Tharnikal Village, Kalwakurthy Mandal, Nagarkumool District ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Habeas corpus, directing the respondents more particularly respondents No. 5 and No. 6 to cause production of detenues petitioner's minor daughters detenues 1) Suhana Sulthana D/o Mohammad Abrar Ahmed, aged 15 Yrs,2) Baby Sana Sulthana D/o Mohd. Abrar Ahmed, aged 11 Years, Occ. Students, who are in the illegal custody of respondent's No. 5 and family members after declaring their detention is illegal and set them free before this Hon'ble court. Counse! for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD. ANWAR ALI FOR SRI SALIMODDIN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 'l to 4: SR! T.
RAVI KUMAR, AGP, FOR THE ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos. S & 6: SRt SHAIKH AHMED ALl, FOR SRI MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG The Court made the following: ORDER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OT TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAD THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 5372 OF 2026 DIITE,: 24. 02. 2o126 Between: Mohammad Abrar Ahmed ... Petitioner And The State of Telangana and five Others. .. Respondents Mr. Mohd. Anwar AIi, learned counsel representing Mr. Salimoddin, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Mr. T. Ravi Kumar, the learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent Nos- 1 to 4. Mr. Shaikh Ahmed AIi, learned counsel representing Mr. Mirza Nisar Ahmed Baig, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 5 & 6. ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya) 1.
The Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the private respondent Nos. S & 6, who are the maternal uncle and grandfather of the alleged detenues to produce the alleged detenues before this Court and subsequently to set them free. ,,. ,,-.. -,C 2. The petitioner claims to be the father of the alleged detenut:s, who are the minors aged about 15 and 11 years. The petitioner's wife/mother of. the alleged detenues passed away on 0,6. o2. 2024. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader was directed to producr: the alleged detenues in Court. 4. Pursuant thereto, the alleged detenues are produced before this Court today and submitted that they have been residinlS with their maternal uncle and grandfather for the last 2 years, s;pecifically after the death of their mother. 5. T'he Court asked specilic questions to the alleged detenu,:s as to whether they intend to return to their father/petitioner.
Both the alleged detenues, individually and categorically, stated that they do not wish to return to their father or live with him since the petitioner had tortured and physiczrlly abused their mother which ted to her death. 6. 'l'his Court further inquired whether they are willing to meet the petitioner occasionally on a weekly or monthly basis. ':he Both alleged detenues declined such suggestion and expressed their clear intention not to meet their father under any circumstances. E-tr \ \ t I in 7. Since the detenues have expressed their intentions Petition open Court, nothing further remains in the Writ for no ground hold that Habeas Corpus. Furthermore, there is to the the respondent Nos. S & 6 have illegally detained alleged . detenues g. w. P. No. 5372 of 2026, along with all connected shall no order applications, is accordingly dismissed. There be as to costs. SD/. A.
JAYASREE ASSISTANT REG //TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to SRI SALIMODDIN, Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to SRI MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG, Advocate [OPUC] 3 Two cCs to THE ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL, High court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies PMK BS d- # HIGH COT'RT DATED:2410212026 1 t': E z, 13 u 13 t{Afl? ffi 6) b * * o D6 ,9i:,! ORDER WP. No. 5372 ot 2026 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS sls ,rl
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.