MR. SRIKANTH v. THE REVENUE SECRETARY
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: E.S.INDIRESH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-10. MR. SRIKANTH v. THE REVENUE SECRETARY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 24947 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 24947 OF 2022 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: 1. MR. SRIKANTH S/O. LATE SESHADRI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 2. MR. SREENATH S/O. LATE SESHADRI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT BASARALU VILLAGE, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI AND: Location: High Court of Karnataka 1. THE REVENUE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT, MINTO ANJANEYA BHAVAN, - 2 - WP No. 24947 of 2022 CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU - 560 018. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401. 4. THE TAHASILDAR MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA - 571 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.
MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE E, F AND G DATED 28. 10. 2021, 28. 10. 2022, 29. 10. 2022 AND THEREBY GIVE POSITIVE DIRECTION EFFECTIVELY TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THERE BY PAY AN AMOUNT TO THE PETITIONER TO PERFORM POOJA OF LAKSHMINARAYANA TEMPLE OF BAARALU VILLAGE , MANDYA TALUK AND MANDYA DISTRICT AND ETC. , THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH - 3 - WP No. 24947 of 2022 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Sri. Surendra Kumar N. , and learned Additional Government Advocate Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is to consider the representations at Annexure – E dated 28. 10. 2021, Annexure – F dated 28. 10.
2022 and Annexure – G dated 29. 10. 2022 to the petition. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are hereby directed to consider the aforementioned representations in accordance with law within the outer limit of two (02) months from the date of receipt of this order. 3. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E. S. INDIRESH) JUDGE NM List No. : 1 Sl No. : 39
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.