SMT PUSHPAVATHI v. UMESH
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-06-27. SMT PUSHPAVATHI v. UMESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRL. RP No. 188 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 188 OF 2018 BETWEEN: SMT. PUSHPAVATHI WIFE OF SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT SOPPINAHALLI ROAD BEHIND GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOL D M KURKE VILLAGE, ARASIKERE TALUK PIN-573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI NINGARAJU M N, ADVOCATE) AND: UMESH SON OF SIDDALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT KATIKERE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK PIN-573 201. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI R B DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL. RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr. P. C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT/ORDER DATED 06. 12. 2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN IN CRL. A. No. 258/2016 IN CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 07. 12. 2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE IN - 2 - CRL. RP No. 188 of 2018 C. C. No.
93/2015 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE CASE AND ETC. , THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner was also absent on 09. 07. 2024 and 10. 06. 2025. This Court on 10. 06. 2025 has passed the following order; “Learned counsel for the respondent present. Learned counsel for the petitioner absent. The revision petition is of the year 2018. There are no grounds for adjournment. However, in the interest of justice and in order to grant one more opportunity, the matter is being adjourned as a last chance. List on 27. 06. 2025. ” 4. Considering the above, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter. - 3 - CRL. RP No. 188 of 2018 Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No. : 1 Sl No. : 57
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.