Skip to main content
LawSphereX

THE BRANCH MANAGER v. NINGARAJU @ LINGARAJU

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-16. THE BRANCH MANAGER v. NINGARAJU @ LINGARAJU. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

- 1 - MFA No. 4899 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4899 OF 2020 (MV-I) BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER, BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ST NO. 2951/A D29/1, 1 FLOOR, TEMPLE ROAD, KALIDASA CIRCLE, V V MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570 002 ALSO AT THE BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE ST COMPANY LIMITED, HOSTO CENTRE, 1 FLOOR, NO. 43, MILLERS ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, OPP. IMPERIAL HOTEL, BENGALURU - 560 046 NOW REPRESENTED BY MANAGER LEGAL …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ASHOK N. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NINGARAJU @ LINGARAJU S/O LATE RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O MADDURU VILLAGE, YELANDUR TALUK. CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571 441 2. MAHESH B S/O BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO. 16, CHANNIPURA MOLE, CHAMARAJANAGAR TOWN-571313 …RESPONDENTS - 2 - MFA No. 4899 of 2020 (BY SRI. MANU B. P. , ADVOCATE FOR R2 VIDE ORDER DATED 06. 03.

2024, NOTICE TO R1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30. 04. 2019 PASSED IN MVC NO. 91/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, AT CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT, CHAMARAJANAGAR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 1,08,024/- WITH 8 PERCENT INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF ACCIDENT TILL ITS REALIZATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo reads as under: "The appellant Insurance Company has referred the appeal challenging the Liability and Quantum, on the instruction of the company the Appellant is withdrawing the present appeal as not pressed". 2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - MFA No. 4899 of 2020 3.

Amount in deposit, if any shall be transmitted back to the Tribunal. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE KA List No. : 2 Sl No. : 6

Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.