Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd R/b the Chief Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Dr. Lalsiampara and 9 Ors.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-05-12. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd R/b the Chief Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Dr....
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC030001532024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/13/2024 Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd R/b the Chief Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. North Easter Region, Tuivamit, Aizawl, Mizoram - 796009 VERSUS Dr. Lalsiampara and 9 Ors. S/o Thangtinliana R/o Zarkawt, Aizawl, Mizoram 2:Lalhriatpuia Sailo R/o Mc. Donald Hill Zarkawt Aizawl 3:R. Lalengzika S/o R. Tlangruala R/o Chaltlang Aizawl 4:Lalnunringa S/o Lalzamlova R/o Chawnpui Veng Aizawl 5:Zasanga S/o Zatluanga (L) R/o Tuikhuahtlang Aizawl 6:R. Romawia S/o Chula (L) R/o Dawrpui Vengthar Aizawl Page No. # 2/3 7:Lalremruati D/o Sangzuala (L) R/o Chaltlang Mual Veng Aizawl 8:Vanlalchama S/o Lalzuala (L) R/o Chaltlang Venglai Aizawl 9:Smt. Lalsawmliani W/o Zasanga R/o Tuikhuahtlang Aizawl 10:The District Collector Aizawl District Aizawl Mizora Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ali Hussain Advocate for the Respondent : Addl.
AG/GA, Mizoram for R10 ORDER BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA 13. 05. 2024 Heard Mr. Ali Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner, who prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file an appropriate petition. In the case of Radhey Shyam and Another Vs. Chhabi Nath and Others, reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423, the Supreme Court has held at paragraph No. 27 as follows:- Page No. # 3/3 “27. Thus, we are of the view that judicial orders of civil courts are not amenable to a writ of certiorari under Article 226. We are also in agreement with the view of the referring Bench that a writ of mandamus does not lie against a private person not discharging any public duty. Scope of Article 227 is different from Article 226. ” The prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file an appropriate petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.