Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MR. VIVITO v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS

Court: Gauhati High Court

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Judgment date:

Case summary

Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-10-16. MR. VIVITO v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020006302024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/164/2024 MR. VIVITO SON OF SHIHOTO R/O HEZULHO VILLAGE DISTRICT- NIULAND, NAGALAND VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY/SECRETARY DEPT. OF WORKS AND HOUSING GOVT. OF NAGALANDKOHIMA NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY/ SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND. KOHIMA NAGALAND 3:THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( R AND B) GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : A. ZHIMOMI, Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No. # 2/3 Linked Case : WA/25/2024 MR. VIVITO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SON OF SHIHOTO ESIDENT OF HEZULHO VILLAGE DISTRICT-NIULAND NAGALAND PHONE NO. -9856536995 VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND ECRETARY/SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF WORKS AND HOUSING GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY/ SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND. KOHIMA NAGALAND 3:THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( R AND B) GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : A. ZHIMOMI Advocate for : GOVT ADV NL appearing for THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS. Page No. # 3/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 16-10-2024 (K. Sema,J ) Heard Ms. Lhousino, learned counsel for the applicant. The application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Rule 2(2) of Chapter V-A of the Gauhati High Court Rules, praying for condonation of delay of 11 days in filing the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 22.

8. 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W. P. (C) 204/2023. The grounds explaining the delay is set out at paragraph 2 and 3 of the application. We have perused the application more particularly paragraphs 2 and 3 and we are satisfied that the applicant has satisfactorily explained the delay. The delay of 11 days is accordingly condoned. The application stands disposed of. We have also heard Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Addl. A. G for the State respondents. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.