PREM DUTT v. STATE OF HP AND ORS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-08-01. PREM DUTT v. STATE OF HP AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
( 2024:HHC:6279 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 507 of 2024 Date of Decision : 01. 08. 2024 Prem Dutt …… Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (oral) Referring the interim orders passed by the Apex Court in various Special Leave Petitions preferred by the respondents-State, i. e. , Special Leave to Appeal (C ) No. 10788/ 2023, arising out of LPA No. 21/2023, titled The State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Puran Chand and others; Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 3348/2024, arising out of CWP No. 2366 of 2023, titled Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar Horticulture & Forestry University vs.
Nek Ram along-with connected matters; Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 14765/2024, arising out of CWP No. 2915/2020, titled State of Himachal Pradesh & others vs. Kailash Chand along-with connected Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2024:HHC:6279 ) matters; Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 1552/2024, titled HPSEB Ltd. and Anr. vs. Sushil Kumar, along-with connected matters, including the interim order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in a petition arising out of LPA No. 165 of 2021, titled State of H. P. and others vs.
Surajmani and others along-with connected matters, learned Additional Advocate General submits that similarly situated persons have been extended benefits of similar judgments, but prior to passing of interim orders passed by the Apex Court and further that after passing of above referred interim orders by the Apex Court, no actual benefits have been extended by the Department to any person/individual, except passing of Office Orders in some cases but subject to final outcome of SLPs preferred before the Supreme Court. 2. In view of above, especially for copies of interim orders placed on record, matter is closed and disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to revive it, if occasion arises to do so or to file afresh if so advised. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge ( Bipin Chander Negi) August 01, 2024 (KS) Judge
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.