Jhansilakshmi Mahilamandali v. The Government of AP.,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-20. Jhansilakshmi Mahilamandali v. The Government of AP.,. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 27023 OF 2010 Between: Jhansilakshmi Mahilamandali, Addagutta Division, Regd No. 225102 North Lallaguda, Tukaram Gate, Rep. by its President G. Janshi, w/o G. Rajveeriah ... PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of AP. , rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Hyderabad. 3. K. Sudershan Reddy, S/o K. Yadagiri Reddy Pv4 Employee R/o H. No. 10-5- 492114, North Lallaguda, Secunderabad. .. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction, order or writ more parlrcularly one in the nature of writ of [\,4andamus directing to set aside the order of allotment vide proceedings No.
R210688/2008, dt. 13-02-2009 and consequently sale deed executed vide document No. 1148/09 dt. 23-6-2009 in favour of 3rd respondent be declared as null and void. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2010{WPMP. NO: 34533 OF 2010) '151 Petition under Section CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in No. R210688/2008, dt. 13-02-2009. pending disposal of the WP. ; i Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. MADHAVA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT I I Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: -- I I I The Court made the following: ORDER I I i ! I I i i I I I I I I THI} HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 27o. 23 of 2O1O ORDER: LezLrned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits th,at no further orders a-re necessary in this matter and the cause in the petition Writ does not survrve anrl thereby, the Writ petition has becomc infructuou s 2.
Recording the aforementioned submission, the Writ PetitiorL is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order its to costs. As s;equel to it, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, sha ll stald closed. SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSIS ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// , U ECTION OFFICER To 1 One CC to SRt D Ir/ADHAVA RAO, Advocate tOpUCl 2 Two CCs to Gt, FOR ASSIGNMENT, High Coirrt for the State of Tetangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3 Two CD Copier; PSK- GJP 1 ! ue I \ HIGH COURT DATED:2011112024 ORDER WP. No. 27023'of 2010 S-L,r I rtir 6 7 Z i i i,;r 2025 a \, + -t t * f',i11,1-1t. t' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. v \? 1 \u\z
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.