Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Smt. THADISHETTY ANNAPOORNA, v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SUJANA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-29. Smt. THADISHETTY ANNAPOORNA, v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 595 of 2026 DATE: 29. 01. 2026 BETWEEN: Smt. Thadishetty Annapoorna and others. … Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 2,3,5to8,10&11 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through SHO, Bowenpally, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. ... Respondent O R D E R This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 483 (1) (b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) to reduce the personal bond from Rs. 20,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- and sureties for all petitioners by modifying the order, dated 12. 12. 2025 in Crl. M. P. No. 5916 of 2025 on the file of learned Special Judge for Trial of offences under SCs&STs(POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Sessions Judge, Secunderabad. Crl. P. No. 595 of 2026 2. Vide order, dated 12. 12.

2025, learned Special Judge for SCs&STs(POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Sessions Judge, Secunderabad enlarged the petitioners-accused Nos. 2, 3, 5 to 8, 10 and 11 on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest by the investigating officer/SHO, PS Bowenpally on execution of their respective personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos. 2, 3, 5 to 8, 10 and 11 is that the de facto complainant and petitioners are family members; that they are property disputes between them and in view of civil disputes, the complainant lodged the present complaint against the petitioners and hence, he prays to reduce the surety amount. 4. Having regard to the above and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners/accused Nos.

2, 3, 5 to 8, 10 and 11 shall enlarge on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest by the investigating officer/SHO, Ps Bowenpally on execution of their respective personal bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum each. Crl. P. No. 595 of 2026 5. The other conditions imposed by the learned Special Judge for Trial of offences under SCs&STs(POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Sessions Judge, Secunderabad, shall remain un-altered. 6. With the above modification, the Criminal Petition is ordered. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 29. 01. 2026 YVL Crl. P. No. 595 of 2026 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 595 of 2026 Date: 29. 01. 2026 YVL

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.