Yogendra Singh @ Yogendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2024-12-18. Yogendra Singh @ Yogendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 86994 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -72 Year-2024 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Yogendra Singh @ Yogendra Yadav Son of Dadan Singh @ Dadan Yadav Resident of Village - Badgaon Khurd, P. S. - Adhaura, District - Kaimur at Bhabhua (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 2 18-12-2024 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Adhaura P. S. Case No. 72 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable u/s 8(c)/ 20(b)(II)/ 29/ 27(a) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 3. Altogether 37.
135 kg of ganja is said to have been recovered from the house of co-accused Sadan Yadav and he disclosed that he, in association of the petitioner was cultivating and selling ganja. Thereafter, police conducted raid and recovered 8. 365 kg of ganja from the house of the co-accused Ashok Yadav. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 86994 of 2024(2) dt. 18-12-2024 2/2 He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No contraband article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He has no concern either with the seized ganja or any trade of ganja. At the time of occurrence, the petitioner was not present in the village rather he went to his matrimonial house situated at village Banki. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application. 5.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that petitioner is partner of co-accused persons in the present case, I am not inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. The prayer for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner is hereby rejected. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.