SMT. PARVATHI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: R. NATARAJ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-18. SMT. PARVATHI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 38401 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 18 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 38401 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SMT. PARVATHI W/O SRI. S. SURESH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 4/1, SATHYANARAYANA TEMPLE STREET, GANGA NILAYA, ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560018. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KUMUDA T. A. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRA MOHAN K. , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, Digitally signed VIDHANA SOUDHA, by BENGALURU-560001. MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560002. 3. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER WHITEFIELD SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU CITY. 4. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER WHITEFIELD SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU CITY. - 2 - WP No. 38401 of 2025 5. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WHITEFIELD SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560087. 6.
SRI SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR LAKSHMI NARASIMHA TEMPLE, MUNIYAPPA GARDEN, BEHIND GOVINDARAJU BUILDING, PRAKASH LAYOUT, VARTHUR, BENGALURU-560087. 7. SRI VARADARAJU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR LAKSHMI NARASIMHA TEMPLE, MUNIYAPPA GARDEN, BEHIND GOVINDARAJU BUILDING, PRAKASH LAYOUT, VARTHUR, BENGALURU-560087. 8. MAKKINNI RAMAKRISHNA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BALGERE ROAD, VARTHUR, BENGALURU-560087 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO. 1; SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 5; VIDE ORDER DATED 18. 12. 2025, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS. 6 TO 8 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 (BBMP AUTHORITIES) TO ENFORCE THE TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 25. 10. 2025 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE CITY CIVIL AND JMFC AT BENGALURU K R PURAM COURT IN OS NO. 3137/2025 AT ANNEXURE-G. - 3 - WP No.
38401 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to enforce the order of ex-parte interim injunction dated 25. 10. 2025 passed by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Krishnarajapura. 2. After arguing the petition for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition and pursue the remedy before the Civil Court in O. S. No. 3137/2025. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of dismissal of the petition as withdrawn, pending I. As. , if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand dismissed. - 4 - WP No. 38401 of 2025 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No. 1 and Sri. Pawan Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.
2 to 5 are permitted to file memo of appearance within ten days from today. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No. : 4 Sl No. : 2
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.