MD. SALAUDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-01. MD. SALAUDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010161742020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. /2478/2020 MD. SALAUDDIN S/O LATE MD. SALMAN, R/O SAGARI, P. S. -PRAHALADPUR, DIST- MUZAFARPUR, BIHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BHUYAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA ORDER Date : 01-12-2020 Heard Mr. D Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. NJ Dutta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State respondent. This is an application, filed under Section 439 of the Cr. PC. seeking bail of the petitioner, namely, Md. Salauddin, in connection with Basistha P. S. Case No. 1526/2020 registered under Section 14 of the Assam Games and Betting Act. Page No. # 2/2 Perused the case diary produced before this court.
On perusal of the case diary, it appears that the petitioner has been in custody w. e. f. 05. 11. 2020, i. e. for 27 (twenty seven) days as on date. Considering the nature of the offence alleged and the period of detention, further custodial detention of the petitioner, beyond 27 (twenty seven) days, is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. That being so, the petitioner is granted bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Basistha P. S. Case No. 1526/2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- with a suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati.
The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner: (a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati, without prior written permission from him; (b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case; and (c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.