Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ANAND PRASAD And ORS v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. And

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-11. ANAND PRASAD And ORS v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. And. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 1157 of 2009 --------- 1. Anand Prasad 2. Madhab Mondal 3. Jogindu Singh 4. Prodeep Kumar Pal 5. Baban Lal 6. Gurudayal Singh 7. Sadanand Singh 8. Mahendra Prasad Sharma 9. Dhanu Mahato 10. Smt. Kusum Devi 11. Munshi Narayan 12. Roy Chandra Kishor Sharma .. … Petitioners Versus 1. Steel Authority of India Ltd. , through its Chairman, New Delhi 2. Managing Director, Steel Authority of India Ltd. , IISCO Steel Plant, Bhawanipur (West Bengal) 3. The General Manager, Central Officer Chasnala, SAIL, ISP, District Dhanbad 4. The Executive Director (P&A), IISCO Steel Plant, Burnpur (West Bengal) ….. Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikash Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, --------- 08/11. 12. 2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties through V. C. 2. Mr.

Vikash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this case in view of the specific statements made in para 10 and 11 of the counter affidavit regarding redressal of grievance of the petitioners with a liberty that if any grievance still remains to be redressed; the petitioners will be at liberty to approach the concerned respondent. 3. Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, learned counsel for the respondents is present and submits that as per Annexure A to the counter affidavit, entire grievance of the petitioners has been redressed and therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby -2-disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned respondent if at all any grievance still remains to be redressed. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J. ) sm/

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.