BHABEN TELI @ BHUPEN TELI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-11-27. BHABEN TELI @ BHUPEN TELI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010159392020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. /2452/2020 BHABEN TELI @ BHUPEN TELI S/O LATE BADAL TELI, R/O VILL-PAVOI MOROK BASTI, P. S. -BISWANATH CHARIALI, DIST-BISWANATH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUKTAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA ORDER 27. 11. 2020. Heard Mr. S. Muktar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. H. Sarmah, the learned Additional PP, Assam who produced the Case Diary. By this application under Section 439 of the Cr. P. C. the accused-petitioner namely Sri Bhaben Teli @ Bhupen Teli who was arrested on 22. 09. 2020 is seeking bail in connection with Page No. # 2/3 Biswanath Chariali P. S. Case No. 250/2020 under Section 302 of the IPC. Perused the Case Diary.
There is no dispute that the incident as described in the FIR took place and the present petitioner is the father of the deceased. The statement of the eye witnesses had already been recorded and considering the nature of allegation and the length of detention of the petitioner accused person in my considered view no further custodial interrogation of the present petitioner is required nor there is any chance of tempering evidence as such I am satisfied to grant the bail to the petitioner-accused. Accordingly, the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with the Biswanath Chariali P. S. Case No. 250/2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
15,000/- with one suitable surety of the like to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Biswanath Chariali on the following condition:- (1) The accused-petitioner shall not be leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned SDJM, Biswanath Chariali without prior permission from the said learned court, (2) The accused-petitioner shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case, (3) The accused-petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer. (4) The petitioner shall continue to appear before the Investigating Officer of the above mentioned case after every 10(ten) days from the date of first appearance till such time the attendance is dispensed with by the said investigating officer. Accordingly, this bail application stands disposed of. Send back the Case Diary. Page No.
# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.