SMT. POOJA v. CHINTAN GUPTA
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-05. SMT. POOJA v. CHINTAN GUPTA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA th ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 4084 of 2023 BETWEEN:- 1. SMT. POOJA W/O CHINTAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SAMVIDA TEACHER R/O 25-26 JAORA COMPOUND INDORE AT PRESENT RAMKUMAR GUPTA JI KA MAKAN NO. 912-A SUDAMA NAGAR INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. KU. SHUBHI D/O CHINTAN THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. POOJA GUPTA W/O CHINTAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SANVIDA SHIKSHAK R/O 25-26, JAORA COMPOUND, INDORE HAAL MUKAM RAMKUMAR GUPTA JI KA MAKAN NO. 912-A, SUDAMA NAGAR, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI AMIT KUMAR AGNIHOTRI - ADVOCATE) AND 1. CHINTAN GUPTA S/O SHRI PREMSHANKAR GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SCIENTIFIC OFFICER R/O 25-26 JAORA COMPOUND INDORE OTHER ADDRESS C. D. S. A. S R. R. CAT ROAD (MADHYA PRADESH) 2.
SRISHTI GUPTA D/O CHINTAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCCUPATION: VIDHYARTHI 72, REVENUE NAGAR INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI DEEPTANSHU SHUKLA - ADVOCATE) This revision coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The present Revision is filed under Section 19(4) of Family Court Act Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRAMOD Signing time: 05-02-2024 18:12:10 r/w Section 125 of Cr. P. C being aggrieved by the order dated 27/7/2023 rd passed by III Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore in case No. MJCR 797/2018 whereby the Family Court has declined to award maintenance to the petitioner No. 1/wife & respondent No. 2/elder daughter, however, awarded Rs. 20,000/- per month interim maintenance to the petitioner No. 2/younger daughter from the date of application. 2. The Revision No. 3974/2023 filed by the respondent No. 1 has been disposed off today by separate order. 3.
In view of the aforesaid, the present Revision is also disposed off. However, it is made clear that any observation made by the Trial Court while deciding the interim maintenance will not come in the way of the wife/petitioner No. 1 and elder daughter/respondent No. 2 at the time of final decision of maintenance. 4. With the aforesaid, the present Revision is disposed off. (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE PK Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRAMOD Signing time: 05-02-2024 18:12:10
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.