KAPIL VERMA v. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: SIDDHARTH
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2020-05-22. KAPIL VERMA v. State of U.P. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
In Chamber Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12821 of 2020 Applicant :- Kapil Verma Opposite Party :- State of U. P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Chaurasiya,Namit Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G. A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. In view of the guidelines laid down by this Court, the urgent bail applications have been directed to be heard through Video Conferencing. Written objection has been filed by Sri Dinesh Kumar Srivastava, learned AGA, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant through Video Conferencing. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Kapil Verma, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 308 of 2019, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 411 I. P. C, Police Station- Baldev, District- Mathura, during pendency of trial. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused, Naveen Goyal, has been granted bail by this Court on 04. 5. 2020 in Criminal Misc.
Bail Application No. 12477 of 2020. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 24. 11. 2019. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant through written objection. Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U. P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- 1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. 2.
The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. 3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 4. In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end. 5. The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored. 6. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad. 7.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 22. 5. 2020 Ruchi Agrahari Digitally signed by JUSTICE SIDDHARTH Date: 2020. 05. 22 16:09:53 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: Allahabad High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.