Aamisha Foods Pvt. Ltd v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: RENUKA YARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-22. Aamisha Foods Pvt. Ltd v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
134421 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION NO: 8224 OF 2026 Between: 1. Aamisha Foods Pvt. Ltd, A Company incorporated under Company Act. 1956 Having its registered office address al 1O4, Cecon Manor, Huda Trade Centre, Nallagandla, Taranagar. Serilingampally, Hyd. Rep. by Mr. Asmon Fredrick Prasad, Managing Director & CEO, S/o. Late Mr. Carol Prasad, Aged about 44 yrs, 104, Cecon Manor, HUDA Trade Centre, Serilingampally, Hyderabad. 2. Asmon Fredrick Prasad, S/o late Mr Carol Prasad, Aged M, Occ Business, 104, Cecon Manor, HUDA Trade Centre, Serilingampally, Hyderabad. 3. P Beaulah Vineela, Wo Asmon Fredrick prasad, Aged 40, Occ Director, 104, Cecon Manor, HUDA Trade, Serilingampally, Hyderabad ... PETITIONERS AND 1. State of Telangana, Rep.
by Principal Secretary, Depa(ment of lndustries and Commerce, 4F-39 Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. Telangana lndustrial lnfrastructure Corporation Limited (TGllC), Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, 6th Floor, Parisrama Bhavan, Fateh Maidan Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500004 3. Special Deputy Collector, NIMZ (LA), Zaheerabad, Sangareody Dist. , Telangana. 4. Mandal Revenue Officer, Jharasangam Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. , Telangana ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No-2 in considering the representation of the Petitioner seeking allotmenUexemption of laM admeasuring Ac 4-08 Guntas 124l ] ;! ,ffi+ N111, 1241N112 and 124tNZ and Ac 2-07 Guntas in Sr No.
124lA/j AND 14811111112, situated at Chilepally Village, Jharasangam nri ndal, Sanga reddy District, Telangana as illegal and unconstitutional and cot equently direct the respondent No 2 to consider the Petitioners representatio n dtd r 3-02-2026 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. l. A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circurn itances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be rleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to consider the representation petitior of the dated 03. 02. 2026 =r and dispose it of within 4 weeks, and pass appropriate orde r in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KONDAPARTHY KIRAN KU V AR Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: cp FOR INDUSTRIES & ( OMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Ms. T. KANyA KUMAR, FX:p. SRI M. SRIKANTH REDD'Y SC FOR TGIIC Counsel for the Respondent No.
3 & 4: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA trI. P. No. 8224 OF 2026 DATE:22. 04. 2o26 Between: Aamisha Foods Pvt. Ltd. and 2 others Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce 4F-39, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Telagnana Secretariat, Hyderabad-SOOO22 and 3 others. . Respondents ORDER: The writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: '. .. to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Manda. :mus declaring the action of respondent No. 2 in considering the representation of the Petitioner seeking allotment exemption of land adrneasuring Ac. 4. 08 Guntas, Sy-Nos. 124lA/lll, 124/Al l/2 ar,d 124/ A2 and Ac. 2. O7 Guntas in Sy. Nos.
124/A/ I and L48/1lll1/2 situated at Chilepally Village, Jharasangam Mardal, Sangareddy District, Telargana as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the Petitioner's representation dt. 03. 02. 2026 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with. Iaw and to grant such other reliefs as this Honble Court may deem frt in the interest of justice... " 2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. T. Kanya Kumari, learned counsel representing Mr. M. Srikanth Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGIIC appearin6 for respondent No. 2. 3. The petitioner No. l is al ISO and rSSAI certified company intending to establish industry ior ;r eat processing. The petitioners entered into Memorandum of Understanding (M. O. U. ) with Department of Industries a ed Commerce, Government of Telangana on . stablishing 29. O4. 2023 for the industry at Sarvareddypally Village, Vangir,or Mandal in Nagarkurnool District, to an extent of Acs. S.
lO with capital investment of Rs. 30 Crores. In turn, thc Government of Telangana proposed to extend incentives as )r l) the provision of industrial polic,y and State,s food prc:essing policy, wherever applicable. While things stood tr- us, respondent No. 2/TGIIC proposed to acquire the lanrt in which the petitioners intend to establish the meat pro() :ssing industry. In view of this proposal, the petiti,) 1er submitted representation dated 03 . 02. 2026 seeking r. : :her exemption from acquisition, alternatively, in case of acq: isition, allot the same land for establishing the meat processirL; ; industry. 4 Learned Standing Counsel for respondt:. rt No. 2 submits that MOU is between the petitioners : nd respondent Y No. 1/Department of Industries and Commerce, Government of Telangana, whereas, the land was proposed to be acquired by respondent No. 2. The petitioners should also approach respondent No. 1 seeking the same relief. 5.
In view of the forgoing, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. l and 2 to consider the representation dated 03. 02. 2026 submitted by the petitioners and to communicate the decision thereon, within a period of four (O4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this petition, shall stand closed. SD/- K. BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 6 SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of lndustries and Commerce, 4F-39 Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. 2. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Telangana lndustrial lnfrastructure Corporation Limited (TGllC), 6th Floor, Parisrama Bhavan, Fateh Maidan Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500004 3. The Special Deputy Collector, NIMZ (LA), Zaheerabad, Sangareody Dist. , Telangana. 4. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Jharasangam Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. , Telangana 5.
One CC to SRI KONDAPARTHY KIRAN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI M. SRIKANTH REDDY, SC FOR TGIIC [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at o Hyderabad [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies -=. ;ffi r' I CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 2210412026 l r. lE S R zl 1L ,t/t (s* ,^ 'i) d ORDER f t-) ;t, 2 tPfl Zt? b tl i WP. No. 8224 ot 2026 '[ '.. , -t-, / 'r. 1. a' I I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS pA &e -E
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.