ANURUDHA KUMAR DUBEY v. THE MADHYA PRADESH MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LTD
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-19. ANURUDHA KUMAR DUBEY v. THE MADHYA PRADESH MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LTD. Read the...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 19 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 1447 of 2024 BETWEEN:- ANURUDHA KUMAR DUBEY S/O SHRI CHANDRA SHEKHAR DUBEY, AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED OFFICIAL ASSISTANT GRADE IST 89- DEENDAYAL NAGAR, GWALIOR M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI D. P. SINGH - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE MADHYA PRADESH MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LTD CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR NISTHA PARISAR, GOVINDURA, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. GENERAL MANAGER (O AND M) MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. CIRCLE AND DISTRICT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. JOINT DIRECTOR TREASURY AND ACCOUNTANT DIRECTORATE OF TREASURY AND ACCOUNTS MOTIMAHAL, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. DISTRICT PENSION OFFICER DATIA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....
RESPONDENTS (SHRI SUSHANT TIWARI - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR STATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN KUMAR Signing time: 19-01-2024 05:36:55 PM been preferred being aggrieved by the illegal and arbitrary action on the part of the respondent authority while not granting the benefit of one increment w. e. f. 01. 07. 2016 as the petitioner was superannuated on 30. 06. 2016. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance in the matter of T h e Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL and Ors. vs. C. P. Mundinamani and Ors. reported in Civil Appeal No. 2471/2023 in SLP (c) No. 6185/2020 dated 11. 04. 2023, whereby this controversy has been put to rest and has been directed that even the retired employees would be entitled for grant of benefit of one increment w. e. f. 01. 07.
2016 even if the person has superannuated on 30. 06. 2016. 3 . This fact has not been controverted by Shri S. S. Kushwah - Government Advocate appearing for the respondents/State. 4. In light of the above judgment passed by the Apex Court, this petition is disposed of in similar terms and the respondents are, therefore, directed to revise the pension which is being granted to the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. 6. E-copy/Certified copy as per Rules/directions. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE pwn* Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN KUMAR Signing time: 19-01-2024 05:36:55 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.