MAGHARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-03. MAGHARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:6440] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13869/2024 Sukh Singh @ Sukhdev Singh S/o Sh. Arjun Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Toliyasar, Tehsil Sridoongargarh, District Bikaner (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Bikaner. 4. Sub Division Officer, Sri Dungargarh, District Bikaner. 5. Tehsildar (Revenue), Sri Dungargarh, District Bikaner. 6. Gram Panchayat, Toliyasar, Panchayat Samiti And Tehsil Sri Dungarhgarh, Bikaner (Raj. ), Through Its Secretary. 7. Sharwan Kumar S/o Sh. Bhura Ram, R/o Village Toliyasar, Tehsil Sridoongargarh, District Bikaner (Raj. ). ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6463/2023 Magharam S/o Sh.
Lichuram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Toliyasar, Tehsil Sridoongargarh, District Bikaner (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Bikaner. 4. Sub Division Officer, Sri Dungargarh, District Bikaner. 5. Tehsildar (Revenue), Sri Dungargarh, District Bikaner. 6. Gram Panchayat, Toliyasar, Panchayat Samiti And Tehsil Sri Dungargarh, Bikaner (Raj. ), Through Its Secretary. 7. Prithviraj S/o Kana Ram, R/o Near Hanumanji Temple, Ward No. 08, Toliyasar, Bikaner, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JD:6440] (2 of 2) [CW-13869/2024] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. R. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sharwan Singh Ms. Neelam Sharma, AGC Mr. D. S. Pidiyar for Mr. S. S. Ladrecha, AAG HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners, after having attempted to argue the matters at some length, seek permission to withdraw the present writ petitions, however, seeks liberty to approach the competent authorities of the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed with aforesaid liberty. The stay applications and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 40 & 42/-SanjayS/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.