SOHIL S. SANGMA v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-09-09. SOHIL S. SANGMA v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 56 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG W(C) No. 265 of 2026 Date of Decision: 09. 09. 2026 Shri Sohil S. Sangma, S/o Tenoti S. Sangma, R/o Rajabala, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Meghalaya represented by The Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. The Director of School Education and Literacy, Meghalaya, Shillong. 3. The Sub-Divisional Schools Education Officer, West Garo Hills District, Tura, Meghalaya 4. President of the Special Interim Managing Committee, Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya 5. Secretary of Special Interim Managing Committee, Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya 6. The Head master-cum-Secretary of Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya. 7.
Shri Sajan Ali, R/o Rajabala, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya-794104 … Respondent(s) __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. T. Sangma, Adv. with Ms. G. Ch. Marak, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. S. Bhattacharjee, GA (For R 1-3) Mr. M. Sarma, Adv. with Mr. S. R. Alom, Adv. (For R 5) Ms. M. Rahman, Adv. (For R 7) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner had approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the result of the personal interview for the post of Chowkidar at Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya, and had also impugned the selection of the respondent No. 7. 2. As it is now reported by the learned counsel for the State respondents that the appointment of the respondent No.
7, has since been recalled and the petitioner has been appointed in his place, Mr. P. T. Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. The prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of, on withdrawal. JUDGE Meghalaya 09. 09. 2026 “V. Lyndem-AR-PS”
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.