MANORANJAN DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-11. MANORANJAN DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010169712020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. /2636/2020 MANORANJAN DAS S/O LATE MUNINDRA DAS, R/O VILL-SIMLAGURI, P. S. -GOBARDHANA, DIST-BAKSA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S ALIM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN O R D E R 11-12-2020. By filing this petition under Section 439 of the CrPC, petitioner Manoranjan Das who is in custody since 07. 09. 2020, has prayed for releasing him on regular bail in connection with the Howly P. S. Case No. 374/2020, under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act. Heard Mr. S. Alim, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. N. K. Kalita, learned Addl. Page No. # 2/2 P. P. , Assam representing the State respondent. The case diary has been produced.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that Section 20(C) of the NDPS Act has already been added in the present case, which pertains to commercial quantity. The FIR lodged as well as the seizure list, prepared in connection with the case clearly reveals that the suspected drugs i. e. (1) Nine (9) cartoons Ensedyl (containing 100 bottles in each cartoon) and (2) Twenty (20) cartoons COD-X (containing 100 bottles in each cartoon) were seized from the present accused petitioner and he was also apprehended. The seized drugs pertains to commercial quantity and the case diary reveals complicity of the present accused with the offence alleged. Considering all entirety, the bail prayer made by the above named petitioner stands rejected at this stage. Return back the case diary forthwith. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.