R. Srinivas v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-05. R. Srinivas v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3301 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO:2907 OF 2024 Between: R. srinivas, s/o. R. satfqna. rfyan. a, 5p ygarp,. occ. lnspector police 4ggo - -[ro. '- of 'dniuvyamini (under suspension), P. s;,. Rgt. _ . . Airfrort,. clbgrabad, R/o. nat Fr', Apartments, Street No. 4, Habdiguda, HyOerabad_S00 007. ... PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, rgPrqse. nted by its. Principal_Secretary, Home (Services-l) - -" Department, s-ecretariat Bui rdings,-Hyoerabad, Gtangini' si;i;. ' 2. The Director General of police, State of relangana, Hyderabad. 3. The commissioner of porice, cyberabad, State of relangana, Hyderabad. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus that the suspension order passed by the 3rd respondent vide Rc. No. B2l16lslcYBl2023 - D. o. No. 589812023 dt. 27. 12. 2023 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and violation of Rule 8, Sub-Rule 2(a) of T. S. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1991, the said suspension order vide Rc. No. B2l16lslcYBl2o23 , - D. o. No. s191t2o23 dt. 27. 12. 2o23of the 3rd respondent may be set-side, consequently the petitioner is entiled for reinstatement into service.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders vide Rc. No. B2l16lSlCYBl2O23 - D. O. No. 5898/2023 dt. 27. 12. 2023 g:assed by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: 1. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home (Services-l) Deparlment, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Telangana State. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONERYRESPONDENTS AND R. Srinivas, [i/o. R. Satyanarayana, Aged 50 years, Occ. lnspector of Police (under suspension), P. S. , RGI Airport, Cyberabad, R/o. Flat No. F2, Dhruvyamini Apartments, litreet No. 4, Habsiguda , Hyderabad-sO0 007. ...
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the irrterim suspension order of Hon'ble High Court dt. 08. 02 . 2024 passed in WP. No. 29tl7 of 2004. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. A. SATYASIRI Counselfor the Respondents: SRI M. V. RAMA RAO, (SPL GOVT PLEADER)) The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK WRIT PETITION No. 29O7 of 2024 THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE i Between: \ R. Srinivas \ Petitioner AND State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home (Services-l) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and (2) others. ... Respondents ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed challenging the suspension order i passed by the respondent No. 3 dated 27. 12. 2023 as arbitrary and illega1 2.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the suspension order passed against 1r' the petitioner was revoked and the petitioner was reinstated into service by the respondents vide order dated 7. 3. 2024 and therefore, no furt. er orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. 9' Rercording the above submission, this writ petition is closed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha, stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. '^K'[rTlfl'Al'3i. 1AXX //TRUE COPYII 6 To, SECTION OFFICER 1. Ore CC to M/s. A. SATyAStRt Advocate tOpUCI 2. One CC to SRt M. V. RAMA RAO (SpL GOW PLEADER) 3. Two CD loPUCl Copies. BSK {$. HIGH COURT DATED:0511212025 lttE s Tl o o rrt0 1i 7 )fiffi z t c) l * * ORDER WP. No. 2907 ot 2024 DISMISS! NG THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS . qE t w
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.