Md. Taufik Haidar @ Md. Taufique Haidar v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-04-20. Md. Taufik Haidar @ Md. Taufique Haidar v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 25929 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -156 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUAWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Taufik Haidar @ Md. Taufique Haidar S/O Md. Salim Resident of Village - Patahi, P. S. - Bairganiya, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pushpa Sinha. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 20-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahuawa P. S. Case No. 156 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(i-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. Unknown criminals committed loot of Rs. 2,79,144/- and one laptop from the informant after firing upon two persons injuring them. 4. The petitioner is in custody since 14. 12. 2025. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. 6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 25929 of 2026(2) dt. 20-04-2026 2/2 prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 7. Live cartridge, cash of Rs. 28,000/- of the looted amount and one mobile has been recovered from the petitioner. 8. Considering the nature of allegation and the recovery of incriminating articles from the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 9. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. 10.
It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.