Skip to main content
LawSphereX

K.SAI ESWAR v. PRL.SECY., REVENUE DEPT., HYD., AND 3 OTHERS,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-11. K.SAI ESWAR v. PRL.SECY., REVENUE DEPT., HYD., AND 3 OTHERS,. Read the judgment and case...

Judgment text

[ 325s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 34530 OF 2016 Between: K. Sai Eswar, S/o Late K. Ja sannadha Rao, Aged 39 years, Occ Pvt. Employee, R:/O H. No. 6-3-596/ 1 2,Sri Venkataramana Colony, Khairtabad, Hyderabad - 500004 ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Registrar, Hyderabad (South) Erragadda, Hyderabad 3. The Joint Sub-Registrar, Hyderabad (South) Erragadda, Hyderabad 4. K. V. Karunakar, S/o- Late K. JaganadhaRao, Aged 51 years, Occ Business, R/O H. No. 6-3-596 1 12, SriVenkataramana Colony, Khairtabad, Hyderabad - 500 004. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus thereby declaring the acts and approach of respondents Nos. 2 and 3 that they need specific order directing them not to register any documents of transferring or alienating the Flat Nos. 33, 34 and pent Houses 2 Nos 3rd and 4th floors of Madhu Konark Apartment bearing H. No. B-3- 2221817133, Sy. Nos. 8, 9, 42, 43,44 situated at Madhura Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad thereby ignoring the lnjunction order in 1. A. No. 449 of 2012 in OS No. B9 of 2012 daled 12-07-2016 passed by lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad against Respondent No.

4 are illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of settle law thereby further directed to Respondent No_2 to pass necessary instructions to all the joint sub-registrars working under him not to register any documents transferring above said Flats l. A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 42581 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 not to register any documents of transfering or alienating the Flat Nos. 33 and 34 and Pent houses 2 Nos. 3rd and 4th Floors of Madhu Konark Apartment bearing H. No. 8-3-222t8l7/33, Sy. Nos. 8, 9, 42, 43, 44 Situated at l,4adhura nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, thereby directing to respondent No.

2l to pass necessary instructions to all the Joint Sub-Registrars working under hirn in not to register any documents transferring above said flats pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. SRIDHAR LENDALAY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No. 4:-- The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI IUSTTCE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 34530 OF 2Q16 ORDER: Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to eFflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. SD/- P. Ch.

NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To, '1. Two CCsto GP FOR STAMPSAND REGISTRAfION High Courtforthe State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUI 2. One CC to SRl. SRIDHAR LENDALAY, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies BM /: tD ^ k)*"' t lr, D HIGH COURT DATED:1 111212024 ,. 1r1 iiIA \ a. : i ti3;,:r 2025 ORDER WP. 1,1o. 345,30 of 2016 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS t

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.