ASHA DEVI ALIAS ASHA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-11. ASHA DEVI ALIAS ASHA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7505 of 2024 Asha Devi @ Asha Yadav ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party ----- CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Aditya Kr. Jha For the State: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, A. P. P ----- 03/11. 12. 2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 332, 353, 114 & 120(B) IPC has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F. I. R.
As per the allegation, the petitioner and co-accused Sanjay Rana by making criminal conspiracy instigated 40–50 persons of the locality, who obstructed the police party in discharging their official duty and also pelted stones on them due to which one Assistant Sub-Inspector–Janardan Pandit and constable–Vikramaditya Kumar Singh sustained simple injury. It is further submitted that the petitioner and others under the leadership of co-accused Sundari Devi were protesting against outsource agency of M/s BCCL, namely, Eagle Company to provide employment to local villagers. There is no such specific allegation against the petitioner that she assaulted any police personnel. Co-accused Sundari Devi has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 31. 08. 2024 passed in A. B. A. No. 5599/2024. The petitioner however undertakes to cooperate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, he may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A. P.
P opposes the petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender before the concerned Court below within a period of three weeks. If she surrenders before the Court below within the aforesaid period, she shall be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C. J. M, Dhanbad in connection with Putki P. S. (Bhagabandh O. P. ) Case No. 32/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Satish/- (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.