Korra K.Lachi @ K. Lakshmi, v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-19. Korra K.Lachi @ K. Lakshmi, v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[34441 THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I\4ONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 398 OF 2026 Between: 1 Korra K. Lachr @ K. Lakshmi, Wo. Korra Narsing Naik, Aged about 52 years, Occupation. Household, (Uneducated, senior citizen) 2 Korra Narsing Naik, S/o. Korra Keema Naik, Aged about 60 years, Occupation. Household, (Uneducated, senior citizen) Both are R/o. H. No. 8-2 29311'l 5, Nandi Nagar, Banjara Hills, Road No. 14, Hyderabad - 500034 ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSEDS Nos 2 & 3 AND 1 State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. 2. Smt. Nenavath Rani, Wo. Korra Ganga naik, Aged about 23 years, Occ Household. R/o. H. No. 18 2-1971141GF, Ravindra Nayak Nagar Colony, Falaknuma, Hyderabad, Telangana state' ce,. 888653382'l ... RESpoNDENTS/. oM'LATNANTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS.
, praying that ln the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 5088 of 2020 in Fir No 19 of 2020, pendinj before the XV Addl. CMItil, Hyderabad. l. A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS-, praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay ALL further proceedings in Charge Sheet in C. C. No 5088 of '19 2O2O in Fir No. of 2020 on the file of the XV Addl. CN/M, Hyderabad, It/anoranjan Complex and pass such other order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [. 4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Krishna It4aragani, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.
1 , and none appears for Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER ,=::':#. ;**{ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI ANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DI: /I EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 398 of 2o2ti DATE OF ORDER:- 19. 01. 2026 Between: Korra K. Lachi @ K. Lakshmi, R/o. Hyderabad & another. Petitioners/Ac() rsed Nos. 2 & 3 AND The State of Telangana rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana & another . Respondents ORDER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section t;i 8 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 seekinll to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused lr r s. 2 & 3 in C. C. No. 5088 of 2020, on the file of the learned XV r,dditional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered fo the offences punishable under Sections 498-4 and 406 IPC and Silsfisns 4 & 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act 2. Heard Sri Krishna Maragani, learned cr> rnsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.
2 & 3 as well as Sr Jitender Rao f Veeramalla, the learned Additional Public Prosecut: appearing for the respondent No. '1 -State 2 ,,- EfD,J ,l-,x 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer seeking a direction to dispense with the appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that appropriate orders may be passed. 5. Perused the record. C. C. No. 5088 of 2O2O is pending on the file of the learned XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Considering the submissions made by both parties and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the Criminal Petition by dispensing with the appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court. 6. Hence, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners/accused Nos.
2 & 3 before the Trial Court provided that the petitioners are represented through an Advocate on every date of hearing and that they shall be present before the Trial Court whenever their presence is specifically required during the course of trial. 7. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- T- SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// S TION OFFICER To, '1 The XV Addl. Chief [Vletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, [r/anoranjan Complex, Hyderabad. 2. The Statron House Officer, Women Police Station, Charminar, Hyderabad District. :. ffi =l*v 3. 3 One CC to Sri Krishna N/laragani, Advocate IOPUCI ,: 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State Telangana \ (our) \ 5 Two CD Copies BJLB/PSL o I HIGH COURT DATED:1 9/01/2026 I I d \\- i ','r( a $ 202tr ? r (-) i. x \:'i ORDER + f)t :p,{ CRLP. No. 398 ol 2026 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.