RAKESH KUMAR GOYAL v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. RAKESH KUMAR GOYAL v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 2537 of 2024 BETWEEN:- RAKESH KUMAR GOYAL S/O LATE SHRI LAXMANDAS, AGED-60 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O LAXMI FLOUR MILL DAULATGANJ LASHKAR GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI SANJAY BATHAM- ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. COLLECTOR GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER CUM ADDITIONAL DIST. MAGISTRATE GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. DESIGNATED OFFICER FOOD SAFETY A D M I N I S T R AT I O N GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. AVNISH GUPTA FOOD SAFETY OFFICER FOOD DEPARTMENT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI K. S.
TOMAR- GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has Signature Not Verified Signed by: CHANDNI Signing time: 03-Feb-24 2:57:49 PM been preferred seeking following reliefs: A- That, the impugned action of the respondent whereby the petitioner premises has been locked may kindly be quashed and direction may kindly be issued to the respondent for unlocking the premises immediately. B- That, further direction may kindly be given to the respondents to decide the representation of petitioner within stipulated time. C- That other relief which it deems fit may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner that the respondent no. 4 may kindly be directed to decide the representation Annexure P/1 filed by the petitioner, as the respondent no.
4 is sitting tight over the matter and had not decided the representation till date. Therefore, if directions are issued to the respondent no. 4 to decide the same, the grievance of the petitioner would be redressed. P e r contra, learned Government Advocate has no objection if such directions are issued to the respondent no. 4 for deciding the representation. Looking to the innocuous prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the representation Annexure P/1 filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. E-copy/Certified copy as per rules and directions. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) Signature Not Verified Signed by: CHANDNI Signing time: 03-Feb-24 2:57:49 PM JUDGE Chandni Signature Not Verified Signed by: CHANDNI Signing time: 03-Feb-24 2:57:49 PM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.