SANTHOSH v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-21. SANTHOSH v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Bail Appl.. No. 8954 OF 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 Bail Appl.. No. 8954 OF 2020 CRIME NO. 1668/2020 OF Chathannoor Police Station , Kollam PETITIONER/ACCUSED: 1 SANTHOSH AGED 36 YEARS SANTHOSH BHAVAN, ULIYANADU CHERRY, CHIRAKKARA VILLAGE, KARAMCODE P. O. , KOLLAM 691579 2 BABU AGED 60 YEARS SANTHOSH BHAVAN, ULIYANADU CHERRY, CHIRAKKARA VILLAGE, KARAMCODE P. O. , KOLLAM. 691579 BY ADV. SRI. K. V. ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA 682031 R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PP E. C BINEESH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Bail Appl.. No. 8954 OF 2020 2 ORDER Dated this the 21st day of December 2020 The petitioners herein are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No.
1688/2020 of Chathannoor Police Station alleging offences punishable under Sections 323,324,341,294(b),308 r/w 34 IPC. The allegation against the prosecution is that on 25-11-2020 at 7. 30 a. m, while the defacto complainant was waiting in a bus stop, the petitioners attacked him with stones and caused injuries on the forehead. They were arrested on 25-11-2020 and are in custody. It seems that petitioners have no criminal antecedents. The weapon used is only stone. Having considered the progress made in the investigation, I am inclined to grant bail to petitioners on the following conditions; (i) Petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of courts below. Bail Appl.. No. 8954 OF 2020 3 (ii) They shall appear before the investigating officer on all Wednesdays between 9 and 10 a. m. for one month from the date of release.
(iii) He shall not threaten, coerce or intimidate the defacto complainant and the witnesses nor shall he interfere in the investigation. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS JUDGE SMF/21. 12
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.