ANCHAL SHARMA v. STATE OF HP AND ORS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-12-26. ANCHAL SHARMA v. STATE OF HP AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 16182 of 2024 th Decided on: 26 December, 2024 _________________________________________________________________ Dr. Anchal Sharma .... Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Amit K. Dhumal and Ms. Parul Negi, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Addtional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Doctor at Regional Hospital Solan, where she was posted as such initially on contract basis vide order dated 08. 04. 2020. Her services were regularized on 14. 10. 2022. Petitioner’s grievance is to the office order dated 23.
12. 2024, whereunder she has been transferred from Regional Hospital Solan to PHC Chandi, Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - District Solan. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is suffering from permanent locomotor disability to the extent of 55%. Medical Board’s Report dated 28. 06. 2013 has been appended alongwith the writ petition. In terms whereof, petitioner is suffering from Achondroplasia and has permanent disability of 55%. 4. In view of above, interest of justice would be served in case petitioner is directed to represent to respondent No. 1 within a period of one week about her grievances against her transfer to PHC Chandi, District Solan. Ordered accordingly. In case such representation is so made, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent No. 1 in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy within two weeks thereafter. Till such time, operation of office order dated 23. 12.
2024 (Annexure P-1) to the extent it transfers the petitioner to PHC Chandi, District Solan, shall remain stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioner does not prefer representation with the aforesaid period, interim protection shall stand vacated automatically. - 3 - Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 26, 2024 R. Atal
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.