LawSphereX

Meena Rajwani v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SARATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-03. Meena Rajwani v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

3302 ] [ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 3660 OF 2022 Between: Meena Rajwani, W/o Kamal Rajwani Aged 44 years, R/o H. N0. 1-2-511101, Sri Krupa Apartments, Gaganmahal, Domal Guda, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District. 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3, 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No. 527, admeasuring 150 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase Il, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gowmpally Village, Serilingampally tr,4andal, Ranga Reddy Distrrct and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from her plot without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Article 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of her Plot No. 527, admeasuring 150 Sq.

yds, comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing notice . ,';' lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the : rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to direct Respondent No. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates noi c interfere with the possession of the Petitioner in respect plot of her No. 51 , admeasuring 150 Sq. yds, comprised n Sy No. 36/24, situated at phase ll, V,i I ryak Nagar Colony Gopanpally Village. Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reri tv District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. VISWANATH REp SRI. PORIKA ABINANDANI. VIALA Counsel for the Respondents: Smt. S. SRAVANTHI, AGp F() ?

REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER r'\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 366O of 2022 THE O3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Meena Raju'ani ... Petitioner AND Thc State of Telangana, Rep. by rts Prir-rcipal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secre tariat, Ilr"derabad & Three others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri C. Viswanath, iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. S. Sravanthi, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. 2. Learned counsel for the peti[ioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the fencing stones in respect of petitioner's Plot No. 527, admeasuring 150 Sq. yards in S1,. No.

36/24, situated at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpallv Village, Serilingampally Mandal. Rarr Reddr District 1a (for brevit_r,, "the subject propertl,") and threarer r ng to dispossess the petitioner front her plot, without issuir-rg anv noricc and without [ollou rng duc process of law, as illegal ar r I arbitrar,r 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further sr. bmits that while adnritting the matter, this Court passed intt: im order dated 24. O1. 20'22 rvrth a direction to maintain statu. i i ro existins as or-t that dare ul1til the ltext date ol hearing in respe :t of the sultject proper-t-\r. Ho,. r'ever. in spite of lapse of more t}-r: . -r tltree and half years, the respondent authorities have not filed < cunter or vacate petition for denying the averments made bv th < petitioner ir-r the writ affidavit, In vieu, of the same, learned couns:l requested this Court to allor,r' the Writ Petition by directinr, the respondent autl-rorities not to interfere u.

ith the possession of the petirioner in respect to the subject property nrithout follou,ir due process I of lau' 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Go. , :rnment Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in ossession of the 5 subject property, the respondents will not 11r erfere u,ith the petitioner's possession over the subject property. ' ,'ithout folloi,ving due process of lau, and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5, In vieu, of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent. authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property, without following due procedure of law. There shaii be no order as to costs 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, sha1l stand closed. NA RAO SD/. S. MALLIKARJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Princlpal Secretary, Departmentof Revenue' T S secretariat' Hyderabad z.

The oistrlit Collector, Ranqa Reddy Drstrlct' RR District' :. iil; il;;;;;e o'id6"ar ofric"i, nii""og Nagar -Division' futanbal, Ranga Reddv District' i. ri'," riniiroir, serilingamoillv Advbcate toPvql 5. One cC to sRt. PoRIKA'AHiNiiNitinNrA rtrXLn of court for the state relansana at 6. iil 66i"t" cp F-oR R'EvEi'iije-,Higr' Hyderabad [OUT] 7. Two CD CoPies BM HIGH COURT DATED:0311212025 v g JA|l 2l]? [ 0 l On. ' PAT( ORDER --: WP. No. 3660 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \16 t[,

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.