THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS v. SHRI SHIWANG KONYAK
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-03-11. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS v. SHRI SHIWANG KONYAK. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020001142024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/29/2024 THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THEN CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND 2: THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA 3: THE CHIEF ENGINEER PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA 4: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHED PHEK NAGALAND 5: THE SECRETARY P AND AR DEPT NAGALAND KOHIMA 6: THE SECRETARY DEPT. OF FINANCE NAGALAND KOHIM VERSUS SHRI SHIWANG KONYAK RETD. WORKCHARGE KHALASI R/O CHANGLANGSHU VILLAGE, MON NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : E THIBA PHOM Advocate for the Respondent : Page No. # 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/104/2022 MR. SHIWANG KONYAK RETD.
WORK CHARGE KHALASI R/O CHANGLANGSHU VILLAGE MON NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND NAGALAND KOHIMA 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING (PHED) NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (PHED) KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHED MON DIVISION NAGALAND 5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS NAGALAND KOHIMA 6:THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NAGALAND KOHIMA ------------ Advocate for : L LIKHASE SANGTAM Advocate for : GOVT ADV NL appearing for THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 11. 03. 2024 Heard Mr. E. Thiba Phom, learned counsel for the Page No. # 3/3 applicants. Also heard Mr. L. Kikhase Sangtam, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2.
By filing this application, the applicants are seeking further 6 (six) months time for compliance of the order of the Court dated 21. 02. 2023, passed in WP(C) 104/2022. 3. The learned counsel for the opposite party has objected to the prayer made in this application. 4. Considered the objection raised by the learned counsel for the opposite party. 5. In view of the reasons assigned in this application that certain procedures require to be followed, after which the matter would be placed before the Cabinet for approval, the Court is inclined to grant further 6 (six) months time to the applicants to do whatever is necessary within the time allowed so that before expiry of the extended time, the order of this Court dated 21. 02. 2023, passed in WP(C) 104/2022 is complied with in letter and spirit and without fail. 6. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed to the extent as indicated above. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.