VIDHYA DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-04-20. VIDHYA DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:17194] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9287/2020 Smt. Geeta Devi W/o Jalaram, Aged About 56 Years, Birai, R/o. Tehsil Baori, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Road, Transport And Highway, Govt. Of India, New Delhi. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector, Jodhpur. 3. Prescribed Authority (Land Acquisition) And Additional District Collector-Iii, Jodhpur. 4. Project Director And Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Rajasthan State Highway, Circle Bikaner, Bikaner (Raj. ) 5. The Tehsildar (Land Record), Baori, District Jodhpur. 6. Patwari (Land Record), Chak No. 1, Tehsil Baori, District Jodhpur. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9288/2020 Vidhya Devi W/o Om Prakash, Aged About 49 Years, R/o. Birai, Tehsil Baori, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1.
Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Road, Transport And Highway, Govt. Of India, New Delhi. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The District Collector, Jodhpur. 3. Prescribed Authority (Land Acquisition) And Additional District Collector-Iii, Jodhpur. 4. Project Director And Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Rajasthan State Highway, Circle Bikaner, Bikaner (Raj. ) 5. The Tehsildar (Land Record), Baori, District Jodhpur. 6. Patwari (Land Record), Chak No. 1, Tehsil Baori, District [2024:RJ-JD:17194] (2 of 3) [CW-9287/2020] Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kan Singh Oad & Mr. Mohammad Arif For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Dayal Choudhary, DyGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/04/2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners, instead of pressing the writ petitions on merit, seeks liberty to approach the respondent No.
3-Prescribed Authority (Land Acquisition) And Additional District Collector-III, Jodhpur for redressal of petitioners’ grievances by filing an appropriate representation. He submits that the respondent No. 3 may be directed to decide the said representation expeditiously. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondent No. 3-Prescribed Authority (Land Acquisition) And Additional District Collector-III, Jodhpur by way of filing an appropriate representation for redressal of their grievances and the respondent No.
3-Prescribed Authority (Land Acquisition) And Additional District Collector-III, Jodhpur shall decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of three [2024:RJ-JD:17194] (3 of 3) [CW-9287/2020] months from the date of receipt of such representation strictly in accordance with law. The stay applications and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 142-SanjayS/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.