Mr. Mohammad Yasar, v. The State of Telangana,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-18. Mr. Mohammad Yasar, v. The State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD OF DECEMBER THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETIT ION NO: 17117 0F 2025 Between: about 45 Years, Occ' tvlr. Mohammad Yasar,, S/o. Mohammad Jaweed' aged Ali Lane' Hyderabad-1 FriniiutJersiness, R/o. H. No. 5-8-208, Chirag Abids, ... PETITIONEFYACCUSED AND 1. The State of Telangana,, Rep by its Public Prosecutor'High Court at : Hyderabad : 51. Years, Occ. Labour' Fl/o ' 2. D. Raghupathi, S/o. Venkataiah aged about. ! - H rlo. "rC-'o-g16tsl4t11 , BanjawadI Karwan Hyderabad-500006 t I ,.. RESPONOENT/COMPLAINANTS I circumstances Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the ! Petition, the High court may stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal be pleased toto Quash the proceedings against Petitioner / Accused No. 2 in cc. No 5867t2O22, daled 22-07-2022, on the file of ll Addl chief tvletropolitan Magistrate At_ Nampally, Hyderabad.
and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case I. A. N O:1 OF 2025 Petition under 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to prri int"ri, direction by ordering Stay of all further proceedings against 22-07-2022, onlhe file of ll No. 2 i; CC. No. saattzozz, dated ietitionerlRccused At Nampally, Hyderabad and pass such iAOt Cni"f Metropolitan Magistrate other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. N. Ravi prakash Representing sri sUBRAMANYAM DARABOINA, Advocate for the Prosecutor petitioner and sri. Jlthender Rao Veeramalla the Additional Public (TG)onbehalfoftheRespondentNo. ,l. andnoneappearedfortherespondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF IELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREEI{j/AS RAO I CRIMINAL PETITION No. 171L7 of ','025 Date: 18. 12. 20. 25 Between: Mr. Mohamrnarl yasar . Petitioner AND The State of Tel:rngana, Represented by public prosecutor, Higl-r Court, Hyrlt:r-abad and alother. (espondents ORDER This Crirninal Petition is filed seeking I I qrrash the proceedings in C. C. No. 5867 of 2022, on thr. llle of the II Additional Chir. l- Metropolitan Magistrate ,r Nampally, wherein the petitioner was arrayed as accrr,j rd No. 2, for the offences pur-rishable under Sections 324 +27 rlw 34 of Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard Mr. N. Ravi prakash, learnt. , I counsel representing Mr. Daraboina Subramanyam ya< av, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jillr :nder Rao Public Prosecutor for Veeramalla, learned Additional respondent No. i-State. was filed seeking to 3.
Though the criminal petition the in C C No 5867 of 2022' quash the proceedings learnedcorrnselforthepetitiorrcrrestrictedhisprayer dispense with the appearance of requesting this Court to ol 2022' on No'2 in C'C'No'5867 the petitior-rer/accused thefileoft}rellAdditionalChiefMctropolitarrMagistrate at NamPallv. has not Additional Public Prosecutor 4. The learned by the learned counsel for opposed thc submission made petltloner 5. In vicw of the above submissions' and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case' the 2 in C'C'No'5867 presence of the petitioner/accused No' of2o22,onthelrleofthellAdditionalChiefMetropolitan subject to the dispensed with' Magistrate at Nampally, is through his counsel represented cond. ition that he shalt be If the presence of the date of hearing' on each ancl evpry t' petltroner is required, he sha-ll appear b: irre the trial Court.
In r:ast: of his non-appearance on tl , sl]ccific date I i fixecl by the trial Court flor his appearance, 1 r(] trial Court I I I I is entitle d 1o proceed with the matter, in ai , orclance with law. 6. Accorctingly, the criminai petition is drsl osr--d of Pendirrg miscellaneous applications. I zrny, shall stand closcd iBti,f^R\E[$? HXA (, COPY'/ \ //TRUE SECTION OFFICER I To, lyderabad' At. Nampally, Magistrate chief t\retroporitan 1. The il Addl Districi Abid Road Police Station' Hyderabad 2. The SHO Advc< rte IOPUCI DARABOINA CC to SRI SUBRAMANYAM 3 One for tr : State of Telangana High Court 4 Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR' I I at HYderabad IOU Two CD CoPies o. HIGH COURT JSRJ DATED:1811212025 . :F nL S,T4 . i)s /. : '\ '! -. i\ o a i: 2 2 0EC 2[25 (,- r , I - -, ; :''' n :11!. 2 1. , ----"-- - :::27/ ^'-. " CRLP. No. 17117 of 2025 CRIMINAL PEITITION IS DISPOSED OF.
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.