Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Smt. Lakshmi Deb v. Sri Pintu Debnath

Court: High Court of Tripura

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2025-11-21. Smt. Lakshmi Deb v. Sri Pintu Debnath. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Tr. P. (C) No. 23/2025 Smt. Lakshmi Deb, W/O. Pintu Debnath, C/O-Mana Deb, resident of Village- Damchara, P. S. -Damchara, District-North Tripura. ……… Petitioner(s). V E R S U S Sri Pintu Debnath, S/O. Sadhan Debnath, Resident of Village-Nath Para, near Nath Para ICDS, Debdaru, Santirbazar, South Tripura. Presently residing at Village-Chandrapur Colony No. 1, P. O. -T. Colony, Udaipur, P. S. -R. K. Pur, Udaipur, Gomati Tripura. ………Respondent(s). For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Agniva Chakraborty, Advocate, Mr. Sayan Ghosh, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : None. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO Order 21/11/2025 This application had been filed under Section 24 of the CPC for transfer of case No. T. S. (Nullity) 01 of 2024 pending before the Family Court, Udaipur, Gomati District to the Family Court, Dharmanagar, North Tripura.

It is contended by the petitioner that she is residing at Damchara, North Tripura and the case is pending at Udaipur, Gomati District which is about 150 Kms. and it would be difficult for her to attend the proceedings in the Family Court, Udaipur, Gomati District. Though notice was sent to the respondent, it had been returned unserved. Notice was also sought to be sent to the counsel appearing for the respondent in the Family Court, Udaipur, Gomati District but it has been returned with endorsement that the counsel reported that he had no contact with the respondent and he is refusing to accept the notice. I may point out that the address to which the notice had been issued to the respondent is the very address given by the respondent in the case T. S. (Nullity) No. 01 of 2024. It is surprising that the notice sent by this Court came back unserved. It is clear that the respondent is trying to evade service of notice.

Therefore, this application is allowed, since the respondent has not disputed the contentions of the petitioner and T. S. (Nullity) No. 01 of 2024 on the file of Family Court, Udaipur, Gomati District is transferred to the Family Court, Dharmanagar, North Tripura. Petition allowed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ) Pulak Digitally signed by PULAK BANIK Date: 2025. 11. 24 18:15:30 PULAK BANIK +05'30'

Source: High Court of Tripura. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.