ABDUL HAFIJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-14. ABDUL HAFIJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13219/2020 Abdul Hafij S/o Shri Kanwar Miya, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Khedi, Pot Halgana (Chhabara), District Baran. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Parishad, Baran 4. District Education Officer, Elementary, Baran ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Bhwala, through Cisco Webex App JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 14/12/2020 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post the petitioner to place where his wife, who is in Government service is posted. 2.
Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including submission that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions. 3. In view of the submissions, which have been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider (2 of 2) [CW-13219/2020] the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government. 4. The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with the copy of the present writ petition.
If such a fresh representation is made, the same would be considered by the respondents objectively and decided by a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date a copy of this order along with writ petition/representation is placed before the respondents. 5. The stay application also stands disposed of. (DINESH MEHTA),J 99-skm/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.